On 11 October 2013 16:18, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Paul Berry writes:
>
> > Despite the name, this field wasn't being set to the dispatch width at
> > all; it was always 8. The only place it was used was that the
> > constant buffer read length was aligned to it, and as far as I can
> > tell from t
Paul Berry writes:
> Despite the name, this field wasn't being set to the dispatch width at
> all; it was always 8. The only place it was used was that the
> constant buffer read length was aligned to it, and as far as I can
> tell from the docs, there is no need to align this value to the
> dis
Despite the name, this field wasn't being set to the dispatch width at
all; it was always 8. The only place it was used was that the
constant buffer read length was aligned to it, and as far as I can
tell from the docs, there is no need to align this value to the
dispatch width; aligning it to a m
