On Saturday, August 19, 2017 8:56:06 PM PDT Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> In f9fd976e8adba733b08d we changed the clear value to be stored as an
> isl_color_value. This had the side-effect same clear value check is now
> happening directly between the f32[0] field of the isl_color_value and
> ctx->Depth.
In f9fd976e8adba733b08d we changed the clear value to be stored as an
isl_color_value. This had the side-effect same clear value check is now
happening directly between the f32[0] field of the isl_color_value and
ctx->Depth.Clear. This isn't what we want for two reasons. One is that
the comparis
In f9fd976e8adba733b08d we changed the clear value to be stored as an
isl_color_value. This had the side-effect same clear value check is now
happening directly between the f32[0] field of the isl_color_value and
ctx->Depth.Clear. This isn't what we want for two reasons. One is that
the comparis