On Thu, 2016-09-01 at 10:36 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> > From: Emil Velikov
>
> Currently, due to the inverse order, strcmp will produce negative result
> when the needle is towards the start of the haystack. Thus on the next
> iteration(s) we'll end up further towards the end and eventually fa
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 10:36:44AM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> Currently, due to the inverse order, strcmp will produce negative result
> when the needle is towards the start of the haystack. Thus on the next
> iteration(s) we'll end up further towards the end and eventual
From: Emil Velikov
Currently, due to the inverse order, strcmp will produce negative result
when the needle is towards the start of the haystack. Thus on the next
iteration(s) we'll end up further towards the end and eventually fail to
locate the entry.
Cc: "12.0"
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
-
