On 02/08/2012 11:49 AM, Robert Bragg wrote:
This adds the "GLX_" prefix to the string we pass to
__glXEnableDirectExtension() otherwise it doesn't match the name we have
in known_glx_extensions[] in glxextensions.c and doesn't get enabled.
This mistake wasn't noticed before since GLX_INTEL_swap_
On Feb 8, 2012 8:38 PM, "Chris Wilson" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:49:54 +, Robert Bragg
wrote:
> > This adds the "GLX_" prefix to the string we pass to
> > __glXEnableDirectExtension() otherwise it doesn't match the name we have
> > in known_glx_extensions[] in glxextensions.c and does
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:49:54 +, Robert Bragg wrote:
> This adds the "GLX_" prefix to the string we pass to
> __glXEnableDirectExtension() otherwise it doesn't match the name we have
> in known_glx_extensions[] in glxextensions.c and doesn't get enabled.
>
> This mistake wasn't noticed before
This adds the "GLX_" prefix to the string we pass to
__glXEnableDirectExtension() otherwise it doesn't match the name we have
in known_glx_extensions[] in glxextensions.c and doesn't get enabled.
This mistake wasn't noticed before since GLX_INTEL_swap_event was being
implicitly enabled for GLX v1.