On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 05:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp b/src/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp
>> index 799c74b..59adc29 100644
>> --- a/src/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp
>> +++ b/src/glsl/link_uniforms.cpp
>> @@ -547,6 +547,8 @@
On 03/23/2015 05:00 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> Earlier commit 53bf7c8fd2e changed the logic to always call
> base_alignment on structs. 1ec715ce8b12 hacked the function to return 0
> for sampler fields, but didn't handle sampler arrays. Instead of
> extending the hack, avoid calling base_alignment in
Reviewed-by: Tapani Palli
On 03/23/2015 02:00 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
Earlier commit 53bf7c8fd2e changed the logic to always call
base_alignment on structs. 1ec715ce8b12 hacked the function to return 0
for sampler fields, but didn't handle sampler arrays. Instead of
extending the hack, avoid cal
Earlier commit 53bf7c8fd2e changed the logic to always call
base_alignment on structs. 1ec715ce8b12 hacked the function to return 0
for sampler fields, but didn't handle sampler arrays. Instead of
extending the hack, avoid calling base_alignment in the first place on
non-UBO uniforms.
Bugzilla: ht
