On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 12:41 -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 01/12/2016 07:29 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> >> IIRC this should come out as b2i + i2d. You should be able to test this
> >> with llvmpipe/softpipe, which support fp64.
> >
> > Either
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 10:29 -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> IIRC this should come out as b2i + i2d. You should be able to test
> this with llvmpipe/softpipe, which support fp64.
I see, thanks for the quick reply, I'll check this on intel.
Iago
> On Jan 12, 2016 9:49 AM, "Iago Toral Quiroga"
> wrote
On 13 January 2016 at 03:41, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 01/12/2016 07:29 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> IIRC this should come out as b2i + i2d. You should be able to test this
>>> with llvmpipe/softpipe, which support fp64.
>>
>> Either that or b2
On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 01/12/2016 07:29 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> IIRC this should come out as b2i + i2d. You should be able to test this
>> with llvmpipe/softpipe, which support fp64.
>
> Either that or b2f + f2d. I remember there being discussion about this
>
On 01/12/2016 07:29 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> IIRC this should come out as b2i + i2d. You should be able to test this
> with llvmpipe/softpipe, which support fp64.
Either that or b2f + f2d. I remember there being discussion about this
topic when Dave first sent out the fp64 patches. I thought we
IIRC this should come out as b2i + i2d. You should be able to test this
with llvmpipe/softpipe, which support fp64.
On Jan 12, 2016 9:49 AM, "Iago Toral Quiroga" wrote:
> For boolean to double conversions
> ---
>
> Looks like d2b is present but this one was missing for some reason. I found
> this
For boolean to double conversions
---
Looks like d2b is present but this one was missing for some reason. I found
this while testing fp64 support on Intel.
I have the NIR and i965 implementation of this too but that is be part of
the fp64 enablement in NIR/i965 that is not ready for review yet.