On Saturday, October 03, 2015 10:57:38 AM Matt Turner wrote:
> With NIR, it actually hurts things.
>
> total instructions in shared programs: 6529329 -> 652 (-0.01%)
> instructions in affected programs: 14833 -> 14392 (-2.97%)
> helped:299
> HURT:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> With NIR, it actually hurts things.
>>
>> Buuutt not everything uses NIR.
>
> Well...
>
>> Of course I'm sure it has a
>> similar
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> With NIR, it actually hurts things.
>
> Buuutt not everything uses NIR.
Well...
> Of course I'm sure it has a
> similarly negative effect with nouveau/codegen, but I'm not so sure
> a
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 1:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> With NIR, it actually hurts things.
Buuutt not everything uses NIR. Of course I'm sure it has a
similarly negative effect with nouveau/codegen, but I'm not so sure
about things like nv30 which don't have an optimizing compiler
backend. IMHO
With NIR, it actually hurts things.
total instructions in shared programs: 6529329 -> 652 (-0.01%)
instructions in affected programs: 14833 -> 14392 (-2.97%)
helped:299
HURT: 1
In all affected programs I inspected (including
