On Tue, 2016-04-26 at 12:16 +0200, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
> On 04/04/16 18:50, Andres Gomez wrote:
> >
> > This generalizes the validation also to be done for variables
> > inside
> > interface blocks, which, for some cases, was missing.
> >
> > For a discussion about the additional val
On 04/04/16 18:50, Andres Gomez wrote:
> This generalizes the validation also to be done for variables inside
> interface blocks, which, for some cases, was missing.
>
> For a discussion about the additional validation cases included see
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-March
Hi,
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 08:53 +1000, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 19:44 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would really appreciate if you could find some time to review
> > this
> > patch.
> Is there a patch somewhere that makes use of this change?
Sorry, I sho
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 19:44 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would really appreciate if you could find some time to review this
> patch.
Is there a patch somewhere that makes use of this change?
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 19:50 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
> >
> > This general
Hi,
I would really appreciate if you could find some time to review this
patch.
Thanks!
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 19:50 +0300, Andres Gomez wrote:
> This generalizes the validation also to be done for variables inside
> interface blocks, which, for some cases, was missing.
>
> For a discussion abou
Hi,
this patch is still unreviewed.
I'd welcome some help to get this into mesa :)
--
Br,
Andres
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.
This generalizes the validation also to be done for variables inside
interface blocks, which, for some cases, was missing.
For a discussion about the additional validation cases included see
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/mesa-dev/2016-March/109117.html
and Khronos bug #15671.
Signed-off-
