On Thu, 10 Nov 2016 16:01:32 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> On Nov 10 2016, at 2:09 pm, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:57:22 -0600
> Derek Foreman wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > We find the oldest backbuffer we can, on the grounds that clients are
> > o
Hi,
On Nov 10 2016, at 2:09 pm, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:57:22 -0600
Derek Foreman wrote:
>
> > We find the oldest backbuffer we can, on the grounds that clients are
> only going to keep a fixed history queue, so this gives them the
> greatest chance of be
Hi Derek,
On 9 November 2016 at 20:57, Derek Foreman wrote:
> We find the oldest backbuffer we can, on the grounds that clients are
> only going to keep a fixed history queue, so this gives them the
> greatest chance of being able to use that queue via making sure
> the age is ~always less than t
On Wed, 9 Nov 2016 14:57:22 -0600
Derek Foreman wrote:
> We find the oldest backbuffer we can, on the grounds that clients are
> only going to keep a fixed history queue, so this gives them the
> greatest chance of being able to use that queue via making sure
> the age is ~always less than the d
We find the oldest backbuffer we can, on the grounds that clients are
only going to keep a fixed history queue, so this gives them the
greatest chance of being able to use that queue via making sure
the age is ~always less than the depth of the swapchain
Reviewed-by: Daniel Stone
Signed-off-by: D
