Am 21.08.2013 02:05, schrieb Roland Mainz:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Roland Scheidegger
> wrote:
>> Am 21.08.2013 01:28, schrieb Roland Mainz:
>>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
> [snip]
>>> Can you check whether the new code supports -nan correc
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:45 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 21.08.2013 01:28, schrieb Roland Mainz:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
>>> From: Roland Scheidegger
[snip]
>> Can you check whether the new code supports -nan correctly, please
>> (-nan is used by scientific software...
Am 21.08.2013 01:28, schrieb Roland Mainz:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> The (complicated!) math is all identical, there's just minimal differences
>> how
>> sign bit is calculated plus there's an additional subtraction for the
>> argument
>> going
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:12 AM, wrote:
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> The (complicated!) math is all identical, there's just minimal differences how
> sign bit is calculated plus there's an additional subtraction for the argument
> going into the polynomial for cos.
> The logic stays 100% the s
From: Roland Scheidegger
The (complicated!) math is all identical, there's just minimal differences how
sign bit is calculated plus there's an additional subtraction for the argument
going into the polynomial for cos.
The logic stays 100% the same (with a small exception, sign bit calculation for
