On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
>>> really underestimated the size of galli
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Stéphane Marchesin
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
>> really underestimated the size of gallium.
>>
>> It's part of the plan discussed here:
>> http://www.
Marek Olšák wrote:
Hi,
this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
really underestimated the size of gallium.
Build nit -
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/andy/Src/Mesa-git/mesa/src/gallium/auxiliary'
gcc -c -I. -I../../../src/gallium/include
-I../../../src/gallium/
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
> really underestimated the size of gallium.
>
> It's part of the plan discussed here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org/msg17930.html
>
> The
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
> really underestimated the size of gallium.
>
> It's part of the plan discussed here:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org/msg17930.html
>
> The idea is that get_t
On 10/09/2012 07:04 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
Hi,
this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
really underestimated the size of gallium.
It's part of the plan discussed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org/msg17930.html
The idea is that get_trans
One thing to note here. Some Gallium modules already work even if the
returned transfer object is NULL. The drivers where transfer_unmap for
PIPE_BUFFER is actually no-op would benefit from this by skipping the
allocation of pipe_transfer entirely. It's not recommended to use such
a hack now, but i
On Mit, 2012-10-10 at 03:04 +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
> really underestimated the size of gallium.
We used to do this sort of rework a lot in the early days of Gallium,
good thing it's settled down a bit. :)
> It's part of
Hi,
this is actually a very small cleanup that got unexpectedly big. I
really underestimated the size of gallium.
It's part of the plan discussed here:
http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org/msg17930.html
The idea is that get_transfer+transfer_map is folded into
transfer_map,
