On 08.05.2014 00:02, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 05/07/2014 01:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 05.05.2014 22:39, Brian Paul wrote:
>>> On 05/03/2014 07:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 03.05.2014 22:29, Brian Paul wrote:
> The enum numbers were just cruft.
I disagree. Nothing's change
On 05/07/2014 01:33 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 05.05.2014 22:39, Brian Paul wrote:
On 05/03/2014 07:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 03.05.2014 22:29, Brian Paul wrote:
The enum numbers were just cruft.
I disagree. Nothing's changed about the reason I added them in the first
place: When a dri
On 05.05.2014 22:39, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 05/03/2014 07:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 03.05.2014 22:29, Brian Paul wrote:
>>> The enum numbers were just cruft.
>>
>> I disagree. Nothing's changed about the reason I added them in the first
>> place: When a driver is queried for a cap it doesn'
On 05/03/2014 07:43 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On 03.05.2014 22:29, Brian Paul wrote:
The enum numbers were just cruft.
I disagree. Nothing's changed about the reason I added them in the first
place: When a driver is queried for a cap it doesn't know about, it
prints an error message containing
On 03.05.2014 22:29, Brian Paul wrote:
> The enum numbers were just cruft.
I disagree. Nothing's changed about the reason I added them in the first
place: When a driver is queried for a cap it doesn't know about, it
prints an error message containing only the numeric value of the cap.
These explic
The enum numbers were just cruft.
---
src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h | 64 +-
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h
b/src/gallium/include/pipe/p_defines.h
index 9436e7e..6869d69 100644
--- a/src
