Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium/nine: Fix build regression

2017-02-25 Thread Edward O'Callaghan
yes sorry disregard this one, I got report this independently. sorry for the noise. On 02/25/2017 10:18 PM, Mike Lothian wrote: > Are we better off just checking for cmst_active now? Since that's all > we're checking > > On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:12 Edward O'Callaghan > mailto:funfunc...@folklore

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium/nine: Fix build regression

2017-02-25 Thread Mike Lothian
Are we better off just checking for cmst_active now? Since that's all we're checking On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 at 11:12 Edward O'Callaghan wrote: > commit 4a88396 dropped 'PIPE_CAP_USER_INDEX_BUFFERS' however > this case was missed. > > Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan > --- > src/gallium/state_tra

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium/nine: Fix build regression

2017-02-25 Thread Edward O'Callaghan
commit 4a88396 dropped 'PIPE_CAP_USER_INDEX_BUFFERS' however this case was missed. Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan --- src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/device9.c b/src/gallium/state_tr