[ + some CCs that I probably should have figured out first time around... ]
On 23/09/2019 16:40, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 18:07 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
In converting to shift/size-based validation, we lost a condition from
the ARGB/XRGB equivalence check, which left it worki
On Tuesday, 2019-10-01 14:01:09 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> [ + some CCs that I probably should have figured out first time around... ]
>
> On 23/09/2019 16:40, Adam Jackson wrote:
> > On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 18:07 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > > In converting to shift/size-based validation, we lo
On Sat, 2019-09-21 at 18:07 +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> In converting to shift/size-based validation, we lost a condition from
> the ARGB/XRGB equivalence check, which left it working one way round
> but not the other, and broke applications like glmark2-es2-drm on some
> platforms. Restore the eq
In converting to shift/size-based validation, we lost a condition from
the ARGB/XRGB equivalence check, which left it working one way round
but not the other, and broke applications like glmark2-es2-drm on some
platforms. Restore the equivalent check that *both* configs actually
have an alpha chann
