On Wednesday, 2017-10-18 15:32:20 +, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> Hey Eric,
> Eric Engestrom wrote on 17.10.2017 19:48:
> > On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 17:20:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> Yes name is a bit misleading, so I'm wondering if any of the following
> >> won't be better
> >> - s
Hey Eric,
Eric Engestrom wrote on 17.10.2017 19:48:
> On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 17:20:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> [...]
>> Yes name is a bit misleading, so I'm wondering if any of the following
>> won't be better
>> - s/DRI2/DRI/ - might be tad confusing
>> - emit the corresponding DRI2 vs DRI3
On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 17:20:13 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 17 October 2017 at 18:04, Kai Wasserbäch
> wrote:
> > Hey Eric,
> > Eric Engestrom wrote on 17.10.2017 18:31:
> >> On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 15:26:00 +, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> >>> So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned
On 17 October 2017 at 18:04, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> Hey Eric,
> Eric Engestrom wrote on 17.10.2017 18:31:
>> On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 15:26:00 +, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>>> So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
>>> name. This causes confusion, because there is
So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
name. This causes confusion, because there is an X11 protocol extension
by the same name. To make matters worse, the protocol extension also has
a newer version called "DRI3", which then can lead a user to the
assumption that
Hey Eric,
Eric Engestrom wrote on 17.10.2017 18:31:
> On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 15:26:00 +, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>> So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
>> name. This causes confusion, because there is a kernel interface by the
>> same name where a version 3 is
On Tuesday, 2017-10-17 15:26:00 +, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
> name. This causes confusion, because there is a kernel interface by the
> same name where a version 3 is available.
What confusion? Do you have an example?
I'm
Michel Dänzer wrote on 17.10.2017 17:42:
> On 17/10/17 05:26 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
>> So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
>> name. This causes confusion, because there is a kernel interface by the
>> same name where a version 3 is available.
>>
>> This chang
On 17/10/17 05:26 PM, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
> So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
> name. This causes confusion, because there is a kernel interface by the
> same name where a version 3 is available.
>
> This change attempts to make it clearer that the "dri2" n
So far the Mesa-internal EGL driver "dri2" returned "DRI2" as its driver
name. This causes confusion, because there is a kernel interface by the
same name where a version 3 is available.
This change attempts to make it clearer that the "dri2" name of the Mesa
EGL driver has nothing to do with that
10 matches
Mail list logo