On 09/08/16 05:59 AM, ⚛ wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 08/08/2016 09:38 AM, ⚛ wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
I'm pretty sure this breaks ABI. Did you try using an unpatched libGL
with a patched *_dri.so (and vice-versa
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 08/08/2016 09:38 AM, ⚛ wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> I'm pretty sure this breaks ABI. Did you try using an unpatched libGL
>>> with a patched *_dri.so (and vice-versa)?
>>
>> Can you be more specific?
>
On 08/08/2016 10:20 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> how strict are we on that actually? I think whenever we add new gl
> entry points (ie. implementing new extension, etc) we kinda sorta
> break ABI, don't we? I thought mixing/matching libGL vs *_dri.so was
> at least not recommended..
No... we go to gre
On 08/08/2016 09:38 AM, ⚛ wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> I'm pretty sure this breaks ABI. Did you try using an unpatched libGL
>> with a patched *_dri.so (and vice-versa)?
>
> Can you be more specific?
Eh... build Mesa. Save the libGL and *_dri.so. Apply patch
how strict are we on that actually? I think whenever we add new gl
entry points (ie. implementing new extension, etc) we kinda sorta
break ABI, don't we? I thought mixing/matching libGL vs *_dri.so was
at least not recommended..
BR,
-R
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:22 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> I'm
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> I'm pretty sure this breaks ABI. Did you try using an unpatched libGL
> with a patched *_dri.so (and vice-versa)?
Can you be more specific?
Where is the ABI documented?
___
mesa-dev mailing list
me
I'm pretty sure this breaks ABI. Did you try using an unpatched libGL
with a patched *_dri.so (and vice-versa)?
On 08/01/2016 06:21 AM, Jan Ziak wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
> ---
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h | 19 ++-
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 03:43:17PM +0200, ⚛ wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Eric Engestrom
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 05:49:02PM +0200, Jan Ziak wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
> >
> > This is a good change, and with a coup
On 01.08.2016 15:21, Jan Ziak wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
---
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h | 19 ++-
src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_winsys_dri3.c | 3 ++-
src/glx/dri3_priv.h | 5 +++--
src/l
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Eric Engestrom
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 05:49:02PM +0200, Jan Ziak wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
>
> This is a good change, and with a couple things to fix below, it is:
> Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom
>
Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
---
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h | 19 ++-
src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_winsys_dri3.c | 3 ++-
src/glx/dri3_priv.h | 5 +++--
src/loader/loader.c |
On Sun, Jul 31, 2016 at 05:49:02PM +0200, Jan Ziak wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
This is a good change, and with a couple things to fix below, it is:
Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom
> ---
> src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h| 19 ++
Signed-off-by: Jan Ziak (http://atom-symbol.net) <0xe2.0x9a.0...@gmail.com>
---
src/egl/drivers/dri2/egl_dri2.h| 19 ++-
src/gallium/auxiliary/vl/vl_winsys_dri3.c | 2 +-
src/glx/dri3_glx.c | 1 +
src/glx/dri3_priv.h|
13 matches
Mail list logo