On 16/01/18 02:18, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
vsplit_add_cache uses the post-bias index for hashing, but the
vsplit_add_cache_uint/ushort/ubyte ones used the pre-bias index, therefore
the code for handling the special case (because -1 matches the initialization
value of
On 01/16/2018 09:46 AM, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Am 16.01.2018 um 16:49 schrieb Brian Paul:
On 01/15/2018 07:18 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
vsplit_add_cache uses the post-bias index for hashing, but the
vsplit_add_cache_uint/ushort/ubyte ones used the pre-bias inde
Am 16.01.2018 um 16:49 schrieb Brian Paul:
> On 01/15/2018 07:18 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> vsplit_add_cache uses the post-bias index for hashing, but the
>> vsplit_add_cache_uint/ushort/ubyte ones used the pre-bias index,
>> therefore
>> the code for handling
On 01/15/2018 07:18 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
vsplit_add_cache uses the post-bias index for hashing, but the
vsplit_add_cache_uint/ushort/ubyte ones used the pre-bias index, therefore
the code for handling the special case (because -1 matches the initialization
valu
From: Roland Scheidegger
vsplit_add_cache uses the post-bias index for hashing, but the
vsplit_add_cache_uint/ushort/ubyte ones used the pre-bias index, therefore
the code for handling the special case (because -1 matches the initialization
value of the cache) wasn't actually working.
Commit 78a9