On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 19 December 2016 at 08:52, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Tobias,
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>>> Hi Tomasz,
>>>
>>> does this actually fix anything?
>>>
>>> Because right now llvm-config.h does not include anyth
On 19 December 2016 at 08:52, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Tobias,
>
> On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
>> Hi Tomasz,
>>
>> does this actually fix anything?
>>
>> Because right now llvm-config.h does not include anything and I doubt it will
>> in the future, as it's just a collect
Hi Tobias,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 2:15 AM, Tobias Droste wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> does this actually fix anything?
>
> Because right now llvm-config.h does not include anything and I doubt it will
> in the future, as it's just a collection of defines.
> The path to the header file itself is given
Hi Tomasz,
does this actually fix anything?
Because right now llvm-config.h does not include anything and I doubt it will
in the future, as it's just a collection of defines.
The path to the header file itself is given by llvm-config ($LLVM_INCLUDEDIR).
Did you just happen to see this or do you
When compiling LLVM headers, including llvm-config.h, we need to respect
LLVM_CFLAGS. This is especially crucial if LLVM is located in a
non-standard location and it happens that llvm-config.h includes another
header. In such case the detection would fail due to missing header,
because the path is
