On 09/07/2012 12:52 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Jose Fonseca
>>> wrote:
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
>
> wrote:
>>
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Jose Fonseca
>> wrote:
>> > - Original Message -
>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
>> >>
>> >> wrote:
>> >> > Matt,
>> >> >
>> >> > I see you went ahead
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Jose Fonseca
> wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Matt,
> >> >
> >> > I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
> >> > together.
> >
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
>>> wrote:
>>> > Matt,
>>> >
>>> > I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
>>> > toge
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 8:56 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> Matt,
>>
>> I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all together.
>>
>> Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently introduces
>> bugs, so keeping th
On 07.09.2012 17:17, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Christoph Bumiller
> wrote:
>> On 07.09.2012 12:30, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>> - Original Message -
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I see you went ahead and just d
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 3:30 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
>> wrote:
>> > Matt,
>> >
>> > I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
>> > together.
>> >
>> > Touching code that is not built nor tested en
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Christoph Bumiller
wrote:
> On 07.09.2012 12:30, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
>>> wrote:
Matt,
I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
together.
>>>
On 07.09.2012 12:30, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
>> wrote:
>>> Matt,
>>>
>>> I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
>>> together.
>>>
>>> Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently
>
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca
> wrote:
> > Matt,
> >
> > I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all
> > together.
> >
> > Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently
> > introduces bugs, so keeping this around wo
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all together.
>
> Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently introduces
> bugs, so keeping this around won't help bring it back one day in any way.
>
> J
Matt,
I see you went ahead and just disabled it. Please remove it all together.
Touching code that is not built nor tested ends just silently introduces bugs,
so keeping this around won't help bring it back one day in any way.
Jose
- Original Message -
> Cristoph Bumiller was the last
Cristoph Bumiller was the last person to commit any changes to this, last
December.
d3d1x is not built through scons either. If it is really broken and
unmaintained then lets just remove it from the tree, as code will just rot. If
an interested party comes along they can always refer to git his
It's broken and unmaintained, and I'm tired of seeing bug reports about
it.
---
configure.ac | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 82fe225..5ea0752 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -563,11 +563,12 @@ AC_A
14 matches
Mail list logo
