On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 20:19 +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> This was based off similar code in xlib_sw_winsys.c
You're right, that code's all wrong too. I'll send some patches to fix
that up.
- aja
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedeskto
Hi Adam,
Thanks for the feedback
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 19:14 +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > XPutImage requires to copy the images around, and the request may be
> > split over several chunks. Using XShm may improve performance.
>
> Almo
Hi Jose
Thanks a lot for the quick feedback!
On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Sounds good in principle. I'm actually surprised this was happening
> already. I always use llvmpipe the the non-DRI pure XLIB state tracker
> which already does this.
>
>
I saw that code, but I
On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 19:14 +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> XPutImage requires to copy the images around, and the request may be
> split over several chunks. Using XShm may improve performance.
Almost certainly will, the XPutImage implementation is fairly comic.
> +static volatile int XErrorFla
Sounds good in principle. I'm actually surprised this was happening
already. I always use llvmpipe the the non-DRI pure XLIB state tracker
which already does this.
Two comments:
- There's src/gallium/winsys/sw/xlib/xlib_sw_winsys.c which implements
this. I wonder if it would be simpler/clean
XPutImage requires to copy the images around, and the request may be
split over several chunks. Using XShm may improve performance.
In particular, the performances are bad when using gnome-shell with
Spice and playing video. Chunking the update confuses the video
detection heuristic: unfortunately
