> Should we also test for the swrast driver?
That is actually handled by a hack in the Xserver.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/xserver/commit/glx?id=988d7ace19a009991a4528e783d1a94c2444c66a
The extension was manually removed from the list of extensions that are at all
available to the software
> Seems like we should also fix the server to not advertise the extension
> if the driver doesn't have the appropriate hooks implemented. But I
> have no problem with doing this on the client side too.
I've sent a patch last night to xorg-devel to handle it. But since it's likely
to only be inc
On 02/14/2013 09:39 PM, Zack Rusin wrote:
GLX_INTEL_swap_event is broken on the server side, where it's
currently unconditionally enabled. This completely breaks
systems running on drivers which don't support that extension.
There's no way to test for its presence on this side, so instead
of disa
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:39:36 -0800
Zack Rusin wrote:
> GLX_INTEL_swap_event is broken on the server side, where it's
> currently unconditionally enabled. This completely breaks
> systems running on drivers which don't support that extension.
> There's no way to test for its presence on this side,
GLX_INTEL_swap_event is broken on the server side, where it's
currently unconditionally enabled. This completely breaks
systems running on drivers which don't support that extension.
There's no way to test for its presence on this side, so instead
of disabling it uncondtionally, just disable it for
