Il 23/ago/2017 19:57, "Rob Herring" ha scritto:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> On 23 August 2017 at 17:50, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
wrote:
2017-08-19 8:27 GMT+08:
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 23 August 2017 at 17:50, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
>>> wrote:
2017-08-19 8:27 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
> On 18 August 2017 at
On 23 August 2017 at 17:50, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
>> wrote:
>>> 2017-08-19 8:27 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> Both statically linking libLL
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 2:57 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Chih-Wei Huang
> wrote:
>> 2017-08-19 8:27 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>>> On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
dupl
2017-08-21 23:57 GMT+02:00 Rob Herring :
> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Mauro Rossi wrote:
>> 2017-08-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Rob Herring :
>>> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>>> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
>>> re
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Mauro Rossi wrote:
> 2017-08-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Rob Herring :
>> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
>> really need to link libLLVMCore, but just need ge
2017-08-18 21:46 GMT+02:00 Rob Herring :
> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
> really need to link libLLVMCore, but just need generated headers to be
> built first. Dynamically linking t
On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 21 August 2017 at 17:17, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
>>> On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>
On 21 August 2017 at 17:17, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>>> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlope
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 7:27 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
>> really need to link libLLVMCore, but just
On 20 August 2017 at 20:57, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> What does either really buy us? It's really just bike shedding and
> unrelated to fixing the problem at hand.
>
Agreed - it's orthogonal to the issue at hand, I should have made this clearer.
It's an open question, which is not meant to hold the
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Chih-Wei Huang wrote:
> 2017-08-19 8:27 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
>> On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>>> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We do
> gallium_dri_la_LDFLAGS += \
> -Wl,--version-script=$(top_srcdir)/src/gallium/targets/dri/dri.sym
A nice trick to know about.
Regards,
Qiang
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/
2017-08-19 8:27 GMT+08:00 Emil Velikov :
> On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
>> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
>> really need to link libLLVMCore, but just need generat
On 18 August 2017 at 20:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
> duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
> really need to link libLLVMCore, but just need generated headers to be
> built first. Dynamically li
Both statically linking libLLVMCore and dynamically linking libLLVM causes
duplicated symbols in gallium_dri.so and it fails to dlopen. We don't
really need to link libLLVMCore, but just need generated headers to be
built first. Dynamically linking to libLLVM instead is enough to do
that. Thanks to
16 matches
Mail list logo
