https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
Timothy Arceri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
Eero Tamminen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eero.t.tammi...@intel.com
--
You are re
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #15 from Ian Romanick 2011-04-19 17:21:46
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > The downside is that app developers never fix *THEIR* bugs.
> >
> [...]
> >
> > And this is the disaster that we're trying t
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #14 from José Fonseca 2011-04-19 00:19:54 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The downside is that app developers never fix *THEIR* bugs.
>
[...]
>
> And this is the disaster that we're trying to fix via conformance testing.
> This
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #13 from Ian Romanick 2011-04-18 12:11:10
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> In general, I don't like adding work-arounds like this into Mesa any more than
> anyone else. But it's always a trade-off. The upside of doing a "hack" is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #12 from José Fonseca 2011-04-18 07:50:52 PDT
---
> (In reply to comment #2)
> Oh hell no. Report this bug to spec. Seriously.
>
> Issues of differing names of instance ID is one thing, but giant piles of
> functionality is complet
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #11 from pell...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 07:36:16 PDT ---
After bisecting, it seems that the new behavior was introduced by commit
8c631cfeae29b5236928f759e222aa35e6e4984c "r600g: rework vertex buffer uploads"
--
Configure bugmail: http
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #10 from pell...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 06:51:20 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=45768)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45768)
renering result using debian mesa version
I've tested the same app with mesa installe
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #9 from pell...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 06:45:30 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=45767)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45767)
new logs
same results as before. I've attached the logs - there is a little change here
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #8 from José Fonseca 2011-04-18 06:25:00 PDT
---
Created an attachment (id=45763)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45763
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=36295&attachment=45763
Patch to handle NV
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #7 from pell...@gmail.com 2011-04-18 00:24:43 PDT ---
Created an attachment (id=45755)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=45755)
output log
The screenshot were taken (by SPECviewperf) during the "catia-03" profile.
T
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #6 from Brian Paul 2011-04-17 11:36:11 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Wait... None of the Intel drivers expose that NVIDIA extension either. Why is
> rendering correct there but not on r600g? It seems unlikely that it's because
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #5 from Brian Paul 2011-04-17 11:32:29 PDT
---
> Oh hell no. Report this bug to spec. Seriously.
>
> Issues of differing names of instance ID is one thing, but giant piles of
> functionality is completely different. This is a MAJ
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
Ian Romanick changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i...@freedesktop.org
--
Configure bugmai
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #4 from Ian Romanick 2011-04-16 18:52:21 PDT
---
Wait... None of the Intel drivers expose that NVIDIA extension either. Why is
rendering correct there but not on r600g? It seems unlikely that it's because
of GL_NV_fragment_program2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
--- Comment #3 from Ian Romanick 2011-04-16 18:49:14 PDT
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This is a bug in SPECviewperf11, which relies on NV_fragment_program2
> extension, even when it is not advertised.
>
> Me and Brian have a patch that workar
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36295
José Fonseca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Product|DRI |Mesa
Version|unspecified
17 matches
Mail list logo
