On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 02:37:54PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > 2. Instead of just posting md5sum for the release tarballs, I think we
> > should start GPG signing them. I'm not sure what sort of process we want to
> > establish for this. Sh
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:38:11PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> To keep in the habit of doing regular releases, I'd like to propose
> the following set of release dates. We had previously discussed
> doing stable releases monthly and feature releases every six months.
> This set of dates basically
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 08:53:12AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > Can someone please review and commit this? A lot of the piglit
> > tests fail because of this.
> >
> >
> > Kurt
> >
> > On Fri,
Can someone please review and commit this? A lot of the piglit
tests fail because of this.
Kurt
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 12:19:42AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> commit 87f12bb2d95236c7b025d1a8be56b5ab1683d702 tried to fix rb->mt
> being NULL, but change this case wrong.
>
>
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 02:19:36AM +0200, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
> Am 18.05.2012 23:55, schrieb Kurt Roeckx:
> > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:11:38AM -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >>
> >> It sounds a sensible plan, but I wonder if the multiple iround
> >> v
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 09:11:38AM -0700, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
> It sounds a sensible plan, but I wonder if the multiple iround versions are
> really worth it: SSE2 is guaranteed in x64, so we could just start requiring
> SSE2 on x86, and only use the C for other platforms.
Is the "start requi
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:51:45PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> I've picked a bunch of these over. I didn't take ae92180 because it
> enables an extension (GL_ARB_draw_instanced) that wasn't previously
> enabled on 8.0.x. I'd do some more tomorrow.
The commit message says it disables it for p
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 10:12:36PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > >On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Part
commit 87f12bb2d95236c7b025d1a8be56b5ab1683d702 tried to fix rb->mt
being NULL, but change this case wrong.
Note: this is a candidate for the 8.0 branch
Signed-off-by: Kurt Roeckx
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i915/i830_state.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --gi
On Sat, May 05, 2012 at 09:18:24PM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 05/04/2012 03:57 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> >On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
> >>
> >>Part of the reason there are so few changes is that people get lazy
> >>about
On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 08:32:11AM -0700, Ian Romanick wrote:
>
> Part of the reason there are so few changes is that people get lazy
> about cherry picking fixes over. :) Having regularly planned
> releases (with reminder messages) should help keep people on track.
I'm still missing patches mark
Hi,
I've send a few patches to the bug tracker, but get no reaction to
them. They're very simple and fix problems found by piglit on
i830/i915. I wonder why they don't get applied. Should I send
them to the list instead?
Anyway, you can find them here:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 05:50:29PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I think it would be much better to just ditch DRI1 at this point, since
> KMS and DRI2 are quite well established, and are relied on by shipping
> desktop environments.
Does this mean I can't use UMS anymore, and so can't have an
accel
13 matches
Mail list logo
