ithout wasting too much time? In detail:
> - update gallium-double-opcode branch
> - apply your suggested llvmpipe change
> - commit your modified try.py with another name, e.g., tri-dmul.py
>
> Jose
>
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 08:08 -0700, Igor Oliveira wrote:
>> Yep,
>>
&
gt;
> Jose
>
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 07:41 -0700, Igor Oliveira wrote:
>> Hi Jose,
>>
>> I updated the patch(see below), I am using python samples, modifying
>> the tri.py to use it because the regress tests are outdated.
>> Now we have we can get the msb and t
is better than no implementation, but
> I'd like to go a bit further and get this nailed, and not have to redo this
> code.
>
> Is there a simple test case I can use to exercise and test this?
>
> Jose
>
>
> From: mesa-dev-
- create helper function
- implement DMUL opcode
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c | 78 +++
1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c
b/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_tgsi_soa.c
ind
