On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 5:32 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 09:53:56PM +, Marek Olšák wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 5:32 AM Brian Starkey
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:24:58AM +, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > For that reason I think linear m
On Thu, Dec 19, 2024 at 09:02:27AM +, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 at 10:32, Brian Starkey wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:24:58AM +, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > > For that reason I think linear modifiers with explicit pitch/size
> > > alignment constraints is a sound conce
On 2024-12-19 10:02, Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> How this would be used in practice is also way too underdocumented. We
> need to document that exact-round-up 64b is more restrictive than
> any-multiple-of 64b is more restrictive than 'classic' linear. We need
> to document what people should advertis
On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 09:53:56PM +, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 5:32 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:24:58AM +, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > For that reason I think linear modifiers with explicit pitch/size
> > > alignment constraints is a s
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 at 02:54, Marek Olšák wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 5:32 AM Brian Starkey wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:24:58AM +, Simona Vetter wrote:
>> > For that reason I think linear modifiers with explicit pitch/size
>> > alignment constraints is a sound concept and fits i
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 at 10:32, Brian Starkey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 11:24:58AM +, Simona Vetter wrote:
> > For that reason I think linear modifiers with explicit pitch/size
> > alignment constraints is a sound concept and fits into how modifiers work
> > overall.
>
> Could we make it
