[Mesa-dev] [Bug 111248] Navi10 Font rendering issue in Overwatch

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111248 --- Comment #7 from Matt --- confirming that RADV_DEBUG=nongg workaround fixes the font rendering -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are the QA Contact for the bug.

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 111265] [TRACKER] Mesa 19.2 feature tracker

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111265 Bug 111265 depends on bug 111274, which changed state. Bug 111274 Summary: Feature: support gpu metrics in iris https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111274 What|Removed |Added --

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Francisco Jerez
Jason Ekstrand writes: > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:22 PM Francisco Jerez > wrote: > >> Jason Ekstrand writes: >> >> > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:22 PM Francisco Jerez >> > wrote: >> > >> >> See "i965/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior." >> >> for the rationale. Marked opt

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 2:22 PM Francisco Jerez wrote: > Jason Ekstrand writes: > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:22 PM Francisco Jerez > > wrote: > > > >> See "i965/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior." > >> for the rationale. Marked optional because no performance evaluati

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Francisco Jerez
Jason Ekstrand writes: > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:22 PM Francisco Jerez > wrote: > >> See "i965/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior." >> for the rationale. Marked optional because no performance evaluation >> has been done on this commit, it is provided to match the hashin

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 110662] shadow artifacts in Assassin's Creed: Unity

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110662 --- Comment #18 from tempel.jul...@gmail.com --- Someone here reports of the issue in Origins, but only with ACO: https://github.com/daniel-schuermann/mesa/issues/105 Perhaps I was a bit too quick judging it was the same issue on Odyssey as in Un

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 111370] Cannot get OpenCL visible with Radeon VII installation

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111370 Bas Nieuwenhuizen changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop. |dri-devel@lists.freedesktop

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] st/mesa: don't allocate mipmapped texture for NEAREST_MIPMAP_LINEAR

2019-08-10 Thread Marek Olšák
Ping On Fri., Aug. 2, 2019, 19:13 Marek Olšák, wrote: > From: Marek Olšák > > --- > src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_texture.c | 12 > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_texture.c > b/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_texture.c > index 0edb3ea5c7

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 111370] Cannot get OpenCL visible with Radeon VII installation

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111370 --- Comment #1 from Michael Eagle --- I am not sure if their amdgpu-pro supports Radeon VII. Have you also tried ROCm? Their effort is mostly focused around ROCm these days. You could try it. If you encounter errors, this is their issue page: ht

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 7:22 PM Francisco Jerez wrote: > See "i965/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior." > for the rationale. Marked optional because no performance evaluation > has been done on this commit, it is provided to match the hashing > settings of the Iris driver.

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
This gets us +2.7% on Aztec Ruins (5 runs on each branch) On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 7:31 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote: > Let's hold this for at least a tiny bit. I'll run some benchmarks and may > want to tweak how in interacts with the rest of the vulkan state > tracking. > Thanks for figuring out a h

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 111370] Cannot get OpenCL visible with Radeon VII installation

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111370 Bug ID: 111370 Summary: Cannot get OpenCL visible with Radeon VII installation Product: Mesa Version: unspecified Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status:

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 111248] Navi10 Font rendering issue in Overwatch

2019-08-10 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111248 --- Comment #6 from Bas Nieuwenhuizen --- Seems like a Geometry Shader issue with NGG (primitive shaders). You can specify RADV_DEBUG=nongg as a workaround for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Jason Ekstrand
Let's hold this for at least a tiny bit. I'll run some benchmarks and may want to tweak how in interacts with the rest of the vulkan state tracking. Thanks for figuring out a heuristic! --Jason On August 9, 2019 19:22:48 Francisco Jerez wrote: See "i965/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice lo

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] OPTIONAL: anv/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior.

2019-08-10 Thread Kenneth Graunke
This patch is also: Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke though it would probably be best if Jason or Lionel reviewed it as well. On Friday, August 9, 2019 5:20:39 PM PDT Francisco Jerez wrote: > See "i965/gen9: Optimize slice and subslice load balancing behavior." > for the rationale. Marked optional

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] panfrost: Make ctx->job useful

2019-08-10 Thread Juan A. Suarez Romero
On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 15:28 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 06:08:05 -0700 > Alyssa Rosenzweig wrote: > > > @Boris I don't see why this patch particularly needs to be backported to > > 19.1? > > Nope, no reason to backport it to 19.1. It's just a (bad?) kernel dev > habit to p