[Mesa-dev] [Bug 93126] wrongly claim supporting GL_EXT_texture_rg

2015-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93126 Ilia Mirkin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 91888] EGL Wayland software rendering no longer work after regression

2015-11-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91888 --- Comment #7 from nerdopol...@verizon.net --- It seems that mesa master's software rendering also causes some problems with SDL v2, and the testgl2 application that is in their repository for Wayland Reverting Mesa to 10.6 allows this applicati

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: support GL_RED/GL_RG in ES2 contexts when driver support exists

2015-11-28 Thread Ilia Mirkin
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Eduardo Lima Mitev wrote: > Patch is: > > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev Thanks! I realized that this should also return invalid for GLES 1... I'm adding ctx->API == API_OPENGLES and pushing. > > On 11/26/2015 04:57 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> Bugzilla: https://b

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] travis: Initial import of travis instructions.

2015-11-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 25 November 2015 at 07:20, Jose Fonseca wrote: > BTW, I setup Mesa with Appveyor (like Travis for Windows) > > https://ci.appveyor.com/project/jrfonseca/mesa > > I'll try to get that going and commited too. > As a person who has broken the Windows build on an occasion or two, yes please. >

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] travis: Initial import of travis instructions.

2015-11-28 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Rob Clark writes: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: Any reason not to add freedreno and nouveau in here? Too bad these packages don't all have "late

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] mesa: support GL_RED/GL_RG in ES2 contexts when driver support exists

2015-11-28 Thread Eduardo Lima Mitev
Patch is: Reviewed-by: Eduardo Lima Mitev On 11/26/2015 04:57 PM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93126 > Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin > Cc: "11.0 11.1" > --- > src/mesa/main/glformats.c | 8 +++- > src/mesa/main/glformats.h | 3 ++- > src/mesa/ma

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 28 November 2015 at 17:06, Francisco Jerez wrote: > ... you're free to propose such a change as a > separate series as long as you fix the documentation, all users and > back-ends of pipe-loader, if you consider it worth doing -- I personally > don't. > That what I was wondering about. Thanks

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Francisco Jerez
Emil Velikov writes: > On 28 November 2015 at 15:10, Francisco Jerez wrote: >> Emil Velikov writes: >> >>> Hi Francisco, >>> >>> In all due respect, I am surprised with the volume of justification >>> you put into some changes. >>> >> And apparently it wasn't enough? :P >> >>> On 28 November 20

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 8/9] nir: move to compiler

2015-11-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 27 November 2015 at 20:45, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Nov 27, 2015 11:26 AM, "Matt Turner" wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 6:50 AM, Emil Velikov >> wrote: >> > On 25 November 2015 at 22:01, Matt Turner wrote: >> >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Emil Velikov >> >> wrote: >> > >> >>> ---

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/9] Move nir/glsl to src/compiler

2015-11-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 27 November 2015 at 18:48, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Nov 27, 2015 10:44 AM, "Emil Velikov" wrote: >> Suggestions on how to make it clearer are appreciated :-) > > Meh, you clarified :-) > Hope next time around I can reach you a bit earlier :-P Emil __

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Emil Velikov
On 28 November 2015 at 15:10, Francisco Jerez wrote: > Emil Velikov writes: > >> Hi Francisco, >> >> In all due respect, I am surprised with the volume of justification >> you put into some changes. >> > And apparently it wasn't enough? :P > >> On 28 November 2015 at 11:52, Francisco Jerez wrote

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/3] radeon: const correctness

2015-11-28 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Add missing `const` specifier for pointer pointing to a const struct. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_swtcl.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_swtcl.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeo

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/3] radeon: whitespace cleanup

2015-11-28 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta --- src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_swtcl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_swtcl.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/radeon/radeon_swtcl.c index 1e19cf7..ed6b25c 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/3] misc janitorial

2015-11-28 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
The second and third patches are mostly aimed at removing non-spurious compiler warnings. The first one is just minor whitespace cleanup in the general area of code touched by the second patch. Giuseppe Bilotta (3): radeon: whitespace cleanup radeon: const correctness xvmc: force assertion i

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/3] xvmc: force assertion in XvMC tests

2015-11-28 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
This follows the src/util/u_atomic_test model of undefining NDEBUG unconditionally throughouth the XvMC tests, to force asserts regardless of debug mode. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta --- src/gallium/state_trackers/xvmc/tests/test_blocks.c | 2 ++ src/gallium/state_trackers/xvmc/tests/test

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Francisco Jerez
Emil Velikov writes: > Hi Francisco, > > In all due respect, I am surprised with the volume of justification > you put into some changes. > And apparently it wasn't enough? :P > On 28 November 2015 at 11:52, Francisco Jerez wrote: >> Francisco Jerez writes: >> >>> Tom Stellard writes: >>> >>>

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Emil Velikov
Hi Francisco, In all due respect, I am surprised with the volume of justification you put into some changes. On 28 November 2015 at 11:52, Francisco Jerez wrote: > Francisco Jerez writes: > >> Tom Stellard writes: >> >>> When probing for devices, clover will call pipe_loader_probe() twice. >>>

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Francisco Jerez
Francisco Jerez writes: > Tom Stellard writes: > >> When probing for devices, clover will call pipe_loader_probe() twice. >> The first time to retrieve the number of devices, and then second time >> to retrieve the device structures. >> >> We currently assume that the return value of both calls

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Mesa-stable] [PATCH] clover: Check the return value of pipe_loader_probe() when probing for devices

2015-11-28 Thread Francisco Jerez
Tom Stellard writes: > When probing for devices, clover will call pipe_loader_probe() twice. > The first time to retrieve the number of devices, and then second time > to retrieve the device structures. > > We currently assume that the return value of both calls will be the > same, but this will