Some GPUs can't do it (I think most of DX9 ones).
We should later decide how Gallium will expose this feature.
---
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_fbo.c | 21 -
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_fbo.c
b/src/mesa/state_
Wednesday sounds good. Hopefully I will find some time to actually test
Gallium this time. ;)
Marek
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:16 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/27/2011 01:14 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>
> > could we please make new bugfix release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2011 01:17 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Registers that are used inside of loops need to be considered live
> starting with the very first instruction in the loop.
>
> This fixes the following piglit tests on r300:
> - glsl-fs-loop-redundant-cond
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/27/2011 01:14 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> could we please make new bugfix releases of the stable branches some
> time this week?
That seems like a good idea. There have been quite a few patches cherry
picked over already. How does Wednesday soun
Nobody has one. I don't think there are many java users in this
community. You should probably query the jogl community.
Otherwise, I think you're stuck hooking it up yourself.
-tom
On 03/25/2011 06:34 AM, Morris Ford wrote:
I am looking for assistance in getting a java jogl app set up to u
Hi,
could we please make new bugfix releases of the stable branches some time
this week?
There is a serious regression which crashes all Gallium drivers in apps that
do depth-only rendering (e.g. in Amnesia). The regression was fixed by this
commit:
commit 7942e6a5ae0113f1cbdf62b772849cf6cdd4eca
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> Strangely, glsl-vs-vec4-indexing-temp-dst-inloop already passes on i965.
> I'm not sure why it would work on i965 but not r300 if the bug is in the
> common code. But it's quite possible.
Could the reason be that, unlike i965 (guess), i
On 03/27/2011 01:17 AM, Tom Stellard wrote:
Registers that are used inside of loops need to be considered live
starting with the very first instruction in the loop.
This fixes the following piglit tests on r300:
- glsl-fs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-vec4
Registers that are used inside of loops need to be considered live
starting with the very first instruction in the loop.
This fixes the following piglit tests on r300:
- glsl-fs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-loop-redundant-condition
- glsl-vs-vec4-indexing-temp-dst-in-loop
NOTE: This is a ca
