Hi,
This is this time of year again, as the weather gets better (or worse
depending on your side of the planet) Summer of code is coming up. So
we will need to update and fill this page with our best and brightest
summer of code ideas:
http://wiki.x.org/wiki/SummerOfCodeIdeas
We have a couple ide
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35168
Summary: svga build fails with Sun Studio
Product: Mesa
Version: unspecified
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Solaris
Status: NEW
Severity: blocker
Priority: medium
This is a 28.1% +/- 1.4% (n=10) performance improvement for the
hacked-up-for-cache-mises scissor-many (n=10), and no statistically
significant wall-time performance difference for the
hacked-up-for-cache-hits version (n=9, first outlier in each removed
from while the IPS was warming up. User time
I wanted to separate this mechanical change from the actual work.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_sf_state.c | 139 +++---
1 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_sf_state.c
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_sf_state.
This is a 49.6% +/- 2.0% (n=9, IPS outlier removed) performance
improvement for the hacked-up-for-cache-mises scissor-many, and no
statistically significant performance difference for the
hacked-up-for-cache-hits version (n=9, IPS outlier removed). No
statistically significant performance differen
Blits between sRGB and linear formats should happen in linear color space.
This fixes piglit fbo/fbo-srgb-blit.
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_blit.c| 57
src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_blitter.c |3 +-
src/mesa/state_tracker/st_cb_texture.c |2 +-
3
On 03/09/2011 11:31 AM, John Doe wrote:
Thank you for the reply.
I tried the patch and SEGFAULT disappeared.
Thank you again.
Here's a more complete patch that removes the now unused gc parameter.
If there's no concerns I'll commit it later.
-Brian
glx.patch
Description: application/pgp-k
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 13:06 +0100 schrieb Ferry Huberts:
> On 03/09/2011 12:23 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> > 2011/3/9 Christian König :
> >> So hey guys what do you think about it?
> >>
> >> And to make my own opinion clear:
> >> I also really prefer tables, but didn't used them in the past b
Thank you for the reply.
I tried the patch and SEGFAULT disappeared.
Thank you again.
UB
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:09 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have posted this question on the users list also but figured this
>> should be the r
Whee, this is quite the Reply-to list. :3
My approach in r300_chipset.c
(http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/tree/src/gallium/drivers/r300/r300_chipset.c
for those of you without a current checkout) is still there, and is
largely the way that I considered best for handling this kind of
thing. It
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:09 AM, John Doe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have posted this question on the users list also but figured this
> should be the right place to ask.
> Apologies if this cross-posting is considered a bad etiquette. Here it goes:
>
> While working with a third party application I re
Hi all,
I have posted this question on the users list also but figured this
should be the right place to ask.
Apologies if this cross-posting is considered a bad etiquette. Here it goes:
While working with a third party application I received a SEGFAULT.
Using backtrace I was able to home in the
2011/3/9 Christian König :
> Piglits glsl-routing and texrect-many tests are failing if this isn't
> working right for example.
>
Those still work here at least, though I think that especially on
Evergreen it simply isn't going to hit the instruction limit for most
shaders.
> I'm using Code::Block
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 12:03 +0100 schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> 2011/3/9 Christian König :
> > before I create another regression with my patches, could you guys
> > please test the attached patch and see if it causes another regression
> > on your hardware? Especially evergreen and any of the R6
On 03/09/2011 12:23 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote:
> 2011/3/9 Christian König :
>> So hey guys what do you think about it?
>>
>> And to make my own opinion clear:
>> I also really prefer tables, but didn't used them in the past because I
>> wasn't 100% sure which feature depends on what and which approac
2011/3/9 Christian König :
> So hey guys what do you think about it?
>
> And to make my own opinion clear:
> I also really prefer tables, but didn't used them in the past because I
> wasn't 100% sure which feature depends on what and which approach we
> really want.
>
I don't think the issue is so
Hi Christian. There are no piglit regressions here on evergreen with that patch.
2011/3/9 Christian König :
> Hi,
>
> before I create another regression with my patches, could you guys
> please test the attached patch and see if it causes another regression
> on your hardware? Especially evergreen
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 08:56, Christian Weiß
> wrote:
>>
>> Consider an installation of about ~600 low budget thin-clients (with
>> almost no 3D support from the graphics chip) running as X-Terminals. Those
>> thin-client stations are serv
Am Mittwoch, den 09.03.2011, 07:00 +0100 schrieb Ferry Huberts:
> Hi,
>
> Disclaimer: I'm just a list reader.
>
>
> I've been wondering about this for a while: is there a structure in
> which information is stored that is tied to the card with which the code
> is dealing, and if not, isn't it a
On 9 March 2011 07:00, Ferry Huberts wrote:
> I've been wondering about this for a while: is there a structure in
> which information is stored that is tied to the card with which the code
> is dealing, and if not, isn't it a good idea to introduce one?
>
> This patch triggered this again for me b
2011/3/9 Christian König :
> before I create another regression with my patches, could you guys
> please test the attached patch and see if it causes another regression
> on your hardware? Especially evergreen and any of the R600 chipsets?
>
I didn't test the patch, do you have a specific applicati
On 03/08/2011 11:22 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Thomas Hellstrom
mailto:thellst...@vmware.com>> wrote:
On 03/08/2011 05:11 PM, José Fonseca wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-07 at 02:38 -0800, Keith Whitwell wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 18:42 +0100, Ma
22 matches
Mail list logo
