Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH] r300/compiler: Prevent the fragmentation of TEX blocks in the pair scheduler.

2010-06-02 Thread Tom Stellard
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 11:39:57AM +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:53 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:41 AM, tstellar wrote: > >> > From: Tom Stellard > >> > > >> > This fixes bug:

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 26487] freeglut segfault because it receives a __GLcontextModes instead of a GLXFBConfig

2010-06-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26487 --- Comment #2 from ri...@free.fr 2010-06-02 22:17:33 PDT --- Any opengl program using freeglut 2.6.0 will crash in fgOpenWindow as a result. I downgraded freeglut to 2.4.0 which apears to work. I have thus no test case to provide, but can point y

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] RFC: DRM Image extensions

2010-06-02 Thread Chia-I Wu
2010/6/3 Kristian Høgsberg : >> But it is less flexible IMHO.  Also, I am not convinced that EGLImageKHR to >> be >> queryable, which is stemmed from using EGLImageKHR to represent >> pipe_resource. >> Using an EGLImageKHR also implies that an implementation must implement >> EGLImage in EGL/GLES

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 0/6] RFC: DRM Image extensions

2010-06-02 Thread Kristian Høgsberg
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote: > Hi Jakob, > > I like the way the extensions are separated and presented.  But I have some > thoughts about the entrypoints and EGL types to use. > > To begin with, I think the goal of this series of extensions is to export a > subset of pipe_scre

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH] gallium: add interpolation parameter to simple shader functions

2010-06-02 Thread Brian Paul
If there's no concerns, I'll commit this tomorrow. -Brian >From cf8780e328b738dcbb8b62e36ec377ac3d815d00 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Paul Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 18:13:00 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] gallium: add interpolation parameter to simple shader functions This lets us specify linear i

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 28280] Regression in mesa branches 7.7/7.8: glXChooseVisual fails to find visual

2010-06-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28280 --- Comment #5 from Brian Paul 2010-06-02 15:10:39 PDT --- I've applied the patch to the 7.8 branch (with fix-ups). I'm not planning on any more releases from the 7.7 branch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?ta

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 28280] Regression in mesa branches 7.7/7.8: glXChooseVisual fails to find visual

2010-06-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28280 --- Comment #4 from Julien Cristau 2010-06-02 12:49:02 PDT --- On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 06:13:11 -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28280 > > --- Comment #3 from Matthias Liertzer 2010-

Re: [Mesa-dev] [Bug 28280] Regression in mesa branches 7.7/7.8: glXChooseVisual fails to find visual

2010-06-02 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 06:13:11 -0700, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28280 > > --- Comment #3 from Matthias Liertzer 2010-05-29 06:13:11 > PDT --- > Created an attachment (id=35934) > View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=

[Mesa-dev] GLSL clipping

2010-06-02 Thread tom fogal
I'm using the classic (OS)Mesa driver w/ GLSL. I see from: http://www.mesa3d.org/shading.html that gl_ClipVertex is unsupported, which probably explains why I'm getting such strange results when I use it :) I might be interested in taking a stab at this, or perhaps just skip ClipVertex entire

Re: [Mesa-dev] debug_named_value description

2010-06-02 Thread Joakim Sindholt
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 19:46 +0200, Joakim Sindholt wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 17:24 +0100, José Fonseca wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:08 -0700, Joakim Sindholt wrote: > > > Hi. > > > I just had a look at debug options in u_debug, specifically enumerated > > > options in debug_get_flags_op

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 4/4] r600: Make next_inst() static.

2010-06-02 Thread Henri Verbeet
--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c | 119 ++-- src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.h |1 - 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c index 6

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 3/4] r600: Assert output registers have a valid export index.

2010-06-02 Thread Henri Verbeet
--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c |4 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c index 2e64a57..652fd65 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c +++ b/s

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/4] r600: Process exports for all written fragment outputs.

2010-06-02 Thread Henri Verbeet
--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c | 38 +--- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_assembler.c index 0677c54..2e64a57 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r60

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/4] r600: Fill uiFP_OutputMap for all written fragment outputs.

2010-06-02 Thread Henri Verbeet
--- src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_fragprog.c | 33 +++-- 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_fragprog.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/r700_fragprog.c index ee4d282..80fab71 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r600/

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-newclear branch

2010-06-02 Thread Marek Olšák
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:02 PM, Roland Scheidegger wrote: > Together with a PIPE_CAP_CLEAR_WITH_MASK_AND_SCISSOR. > > That would be all interface changes needed (so mask and scissor would be > optional for drivers to implement, but single color buffers wouldn't be) > - clearly some drivers can't h

[Mesa-dev] [Bug 28304] build fails on nouveau_stateobj.h

2010-06-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28304 --- Comment #6 from Kevin Hobbs 2010-06-02 07:38:28 PDT --- (In reply to comment #5) > As a workaround try removing 'nvfx' and 'nv50' from GALLIUM_DRIVERS_DIRS in > configs/default:112. > Removing these directories does allow the build to proce

Re: [Mesa-dev] RFC: gallium-newclear branch

2010-06-02 Thread Roland Scheidegger
On 01.06.2010 21:51, Keith Whitwell wrote: >> Anyway, the new clearRT/clearDS functions aren't implemented by all >> drivers yet. That should be ok for now since they didn't use to >> implement surface_fill neither. >> Also, the interface of these is not set in stone yet. In particular, >> they can