On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 12:00:16PM +0200, Nicolai Haehnle wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:41 AM, tstellar wrote:
> > From: Tom Stellard
> >
> > This fixes bug:
> >
> > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25109
>
> Is this really correct? If I understand your patch correctly, what it
>
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> But it is less flexible IMHO. Also, I am not convinced that EGLImageKHR to be
> queryable, which is stemmed from using EGLImageKHR to represent pipe_resource.
> Using an EGLImageKHR also implies that an implementation must implement
> EGLImage i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28304
--- Comment #5 from Vinson Lee 2010-06-01 13:25:19 PDT ---
As a workaround try removing 'nvfx' and 'nv50' from GALLIUM_DRIVERS_DIRS in
configs/default:112.
configs/default
108 # Gallium directories and
109 GALLIUM_DIRS = auxiliary drive
>
> Anyway, the new clearRT/clearDS functions aren't implemented by all
> drivers yet. That should be ok for now since they didn't use to
> implement surface_fill neither.
> Also, the interface of these is not set in stone yet. In particular,
> they can handle a region, which is needed by d3d9, b
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 17:24 +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:08 -0700, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
> > Hi.
> > I just had a look at debug options in u_debug, specifically enumerated
> > options in debug_get_flags_option(). It stands out that struct
> > debug_named_value doesn't have
On Tue, 2010-06-01 at 09:08 -0700, Joakim Sindholt wrote:
> Hi.
> I just had a look at debug options in u_debug, specifically enumerated
> options in debug_get_flags_option(). It stands out that struct
> debug_named_value doesn't have a description field, as is used in r300g.
> I'm guessing that fo
Hi.
I just had a look at debug options in u_debug, specifically enumerated
options in debug_get_flags_option(). It stands out that struct
debug_named_value doesn't have a description field, as is used in r300g.
I'm guessing that for this reason, r300g has it's own system, and I'm
reluctant to use i
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28304
--- Comment #4 from Kevin Hobbs 2010-06-01 07:52:42 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you try a newer version of the Nouveau headers from libdrm-2.4.18 proper
> or
> later?
>
A I see the libdrm that comes with Fedora 12 is patched to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28304
--- Comment #3 from Vinson Lee 2010-06-01 06:47:25 PDT ---
Can you try a newer version of the Nouveau headers from libdrm-2.4.18 proper or
later?
The top-of-tree nouveau/nouveau_channel.h has struct nouveau_channel member
cur.
drm: 607e228c263
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 10:54 AM, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-30 at 05:55 -0700, Jakob Bornecrantz wrote:
>> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 1:19 AM, Jakob Bornecrantz
>> > wrote:
>> >> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28304
Kevin Hobbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|NOTABUG
This was supposed to go to the mailing list as well... sorry about that *sigh*
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:41 AM, tstellar wrote:
> From: Tom Stellard
>
> This fixes bug:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25109
Is this really correct? If I understand your patch correctly, what it
do
12 matches
Mail list logo
