Re: [Mailman-Users] moderator page behind nginx with SSL

On 06/21/2016 12:10 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: On 06/21/2016 10:01 AM, John Griessen wrote: > I could not find any examples of people using mailman behind TLS cert so > I disabled the redirecting to https and the moderator function works > that way. > Either way the general admin pag

Re: [Mailman-Users] moderator page behind nginx with SSL

On 06/24/2016 10:29 AM, Mark Sapiro wrote: put DEFAULT_URL_PATTERN = 'https://%s/mailman/' That fixed it. The nginx folks were quick to spot this also in just a few minutes. Thanks, John Griessen -- Mailman-Users mailing li

Re: [Mailman-Users] illegible message in moderation approval queue

27;s likely why it's base64 encoded. R's, John > >On 9/22/2016 9:58 PM, Matt Morgan wrote: >> I have a message in a moderation queue. It's from a member (everyone is >> moderated on this list) so I think it's not spam or other junk. But when I >> click

Re: [Mailman-Users] Find a smtp server to send out emails

rk full of dusty compromised php scripts. Digital Ocean and Tektonic have linux VPS images that should be adequate for modest mailman lists starting at $5/mo. I'd try Tektonic since they do a slightly less bad job of managing outgoing spam. R's, John

[Mailman-Users] cgi wrappers not properly executing

Options +execcgi require all granted Any assistance will be greatly appreciated. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici cov...@ccs.covici.com -- M

Re: [Mailman-Users] cgi wrappers not properly executing

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 11:10:00 -0500, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 12/15/2016 10:48 PM, John Covici wrote: > > > > When I try to do anything on the web, I get permission denied error on > > /var/lib/mailman/logs/error . If I then make that file world > > read/write, I

Re: [Mailman-Users] cgi wrappers not properly executing

On Fri, 16 Dec 2016 13:04:50 -0500, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > On 12/16/2016 09:20 AM, John Covici wrote: > > > > hmmm, the file system is mounted normally like this: > > rpool/usr on /usr type zfs (rw,relatime,xattr,noacl) > > and I verified that its capable of se

Re: [Mailman-Users] Authenticated Received Chain in Mailman?

o mail systems, but I would be surprised since they're technically quite different and their users expect different features. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/lis

[Mailman-Users] Mailman 3 on FreeBSD

Is it possible to run Mailman 3 on FreeBSD? If anyone has it working can you say if I should simply follow the normal installation instructions or are there any gotchas? -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.o

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 3 on FreeBSD

o look and what should I put in this file? Can I use the same file from Mailman v2? After installing mailman, I'm instructed to run 'mailman info' but this shows a number of errors because the module '_sqlite3' cannot be found. On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 7:06 PM, Mark Sapiro wrot

Re: [Mailman-Users] Users being unsubscribed without requesting it.

ee whether they're malicious. That's why ESPs usually have a landing page with a confirm link, and why we wrote RFC 8058 which defines a one-click opt-out link that uses POST rather than GET, since the URL malware fetchers all do GETs. R's, John ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Users being unsubscribed without requesting it.

In article <7e0bd0e4-b837-4d76-3c14-a0b6dfda9...@tnetconsulting.net> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 08/21/2017 02:08 PM, John Levine wrote: >> which defines a one-click opt-out link that uses POST rather than GET, >> since the URL malware fetchers all d

[Mailman-Users] Suppress moderation message in mailman 2.1 ?

nce they're fine for people who send mail directly to the list. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3

Re: [Mailman-Users] Suppress moderation message in mailman 2.1 ?

How does it try to guess that a message came from a usenet gateway? R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security P

Re: [Mailman-Users] Suppress moderation message in mailman 2.1 ?

to splice usenet groups to various mailing lists. I don't know what version of mailman they use, it's ntp.org. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-us

[Mailman-Users] Rejecting all addresses from a particular domain ?

other words, what do I put in "List of non-member addresses whose postings will be automatically discarded" ? Regards, John. -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users M

Re: [Mailman-Users] options for dealing with DMARC

e is likely not going >to work out as well as you had hoped. That is wrong. See RFC 7489. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.l

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

to do things that would cause DMARC fails. If you want to reinvent DMARC, you could add an option to say that all submissions from me must have a DKIM signature or validated SPF from domain X, where X would usually default to the domain in your e-mail ad

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

if someone is experiencing a lot of botnet spoofage, a setting to say that a user's mail will be authenticated by SPF or DKIM from domain X would get you about 90% of the effect of S/MIME signing everything with 10% of the grief. R's, John

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

In article you write: >On 07/19/18 17:11, John Levine wrote: >> In article >> you write: >>> Yes. Just about everything can be spoofed to some degree. It really >>> depends on what information the owner of the purported sending domain >>> publishe

Re: [Mailman-Users] ARC, was non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

ing on whiteish lists to use with ARC, to say that these domain are known to host real mailing lists so you should believe their ARC assertions. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

obot domains like paypal.com. That's why we have ARC, once AOL and Yahoo abused it to solve the problem they created when they let crooks steal their users' address books. R's, John PS: This isn't conspiracy theorizing, I know the people involved. ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] ARC, was non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

en't likely to send mail with ARC headers? R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://wiki.list.org/x/AgA3 Security Policy: http://wiki.list.or

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

In article you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- >-=-=-=-=-=- > >On 07/22/2018 02:03 PM, John Levine wrote: >> No, it was specified in full knowledge that it would break pretty much >> every mailing list on the planet if used on domains with human users, >> instead of its i

Re: [Mailman-Users] ARC, was non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

In article you write: >On Sun, Jul 22, 2018 at 3:18 PM Grant Taylor via Mailman-Users < >mailman-users@python.org> wrote: > >> On 07/21/2018 02:24 PM, John Levine wrote: >> > I know people working on whiteish lists to use with ARC, to say that >> > thes

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

>/during/ that current SMTP transaction. Right, thereby causing a great deal of entirely legitimate mail that DMARC cannot describe to go missing, along with a certain amount of spam. We've been cleaning up their mess ever since. R's, John PS: >Did they do so knowing that there wou

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

ias. In my world, some people's contributions are a lot more interesting than others, and losing the info about who wrote what makes all lists less useful. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org https://mail.python.o

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

hat comes "from" the >mailing list.  That way everything about the message is verifiably true. Yeah, we've tried that. It would in effect make each message a one-message digest. Let me just say that it would take a LOT of changes to a lot of MUAs to make

Re: [Mailman-Users] non-subscribers getting through--email address in "Real Name"

In article <885f93f0-36ec-d74f-7c5f-52b42f2d6...@jordan.maileater.net> you write: >Hmm.  It would take MUA changes to be fully effective, but a possibility >that comes to mind is to have mailing lists leave the original message >absolutely unmodified, but wrap it in a message that comes "from" the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender

In article <20180804141855.7510026c1...@sharky3.deepsoft.com> you write: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >Do you have access to your inbound mail server? If so, you need to arrange for >that server to *reject* all mail connections from qq.com. qq.com is a >*notorious* source of spam (there are no legitimate E-Mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] gmail

domain that publishes a restrictive DMARC policy? That can cause bounces all over the place. The usual suspects here are aol.com and yahoo.com, but a lot of companies that believe (usually wrongly) that they have a problem that DMARC can solve set DMARC policies, too

[Mailman-Users] Mailman consultants ?

ace I should inquire? Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly -- Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@pyth

Re: [Mailman-Users] Microsoft blocking our Mailman lists

In article you write: >Hi, > >Unfortunately, yes, I have seen this behavior from Microsoft. I have no >idea what triggers it, but my Linode IP has been blocklisted twice, once >a bit over three years ago, and another time less than two weeks ago. It may well not be you. Linode does a poor job

Re: [Mailman-Users] email to sms?

script to that address that takes the contents of the messages and passes it to the SMS API. (Stripping out all the extra cruft, of course.) -- Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies", Please consider the environmen

Re: [Mailman-Users] What to do about SPF rejection?

st and do DMARC rewrites even for domains without DMARC policies, but I'd suggest contacting whoever is subscribed there and encourage him or her to subscribe from an address that isn't gratuitiously hostile to mailing lists. Regards, John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "

[Mailman-Users] Topic Filtering

t the digests to messages relating only to topics selected by the list member? Any suggestions will be welcomed. John -- John Marsden Webmaster: www.lancashirebmd.org.uk www.cumbriabmd.org.uk www.1851-unfilmed.org.uk www.mlfhs.org.uk --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Topic Filtering

Hello Mark Thanks for this confirmation. I suspected it would be the case, but it is good to have it confirmed. Maybe one for the developers to think about... Do you, or does anyone else, know whether Mailman 3 behaves in the same way? Regards John John Marsden Webmaster

Re: [Mailman-Users] Topic Filtering

Hello Mark Thanks for this further clarification. I can live with the anomaly (have to!) but it is good to know the position. Regards John John Marsden Webmaster: www.lancashirebmd.org.uk www.cumbriabmd.org.uk www.1851-unfilmed.org.uk www.mlfhs.org.uk On 03/04/2020 16:02, Mark Sapiro wrote

[Mailman-Users] Re: AT&T RBL again

ng on outgoing port 25. I use tektonic.net which does the latter but the filters are mild enough that outgoing STARTTLS works fine. R's, John -- Mailman-Users mailing list -- mailman-users@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to mailman

[Mailman-Users] Expected mailq behavior/maintenance commands

commands that can be leveraged for normal maintenance or in the case above—more of a kill-switch purge? Thanks in advance for any assistance. Happy Friday! John Lake Application Security Analyst University of Oregon -- Mailman-Users mailing list

[Mailman-Users] Re: Expected mailq behavior/maintenance commands

"If delivery is too slow, you may be able to address this in the MTA. You want the MTA to do no address verification at incoming SMTP time and minimal other checking." I'll keep doing some digging, thanks again for the links and helpful information! John -Original Message---

[Mailman-Users] Re: Expected mailq behavior/maintenance commands

down to 110. Thanks again, John -Original Message- From: Stephen J. Turnbull Sent: Monday, November 1, 2021 12:03 AM To: Mark Sapiro Cc: mailman-users@python.org Subject: [Mailman-Users] Re: Expected mailq behavior/maintenance commands Mark Sapiro writes: > On the other hand,

[Mailman-Users] Re: Expected mailq behavior/maintenance commands

e commands On 11/1/21 7:54 AM, John Lake wrote: > Thanks Steve and Mark! Which file has the VERP_DELIVERY_INTERVAL setting? I > did not see it in mm_cfg or the .py files in the MTA directory. If it is not set in mm_cfg.py, it assumes the default value from Defaults.py. -- Mark Sa

[Mailman-Users] is log4j2 leveraged in Mailman version 2.1.14-1?

, what version does it use? These are the affected versions: Affected Apache log4j2 Versions​<https://www.lunasec.io/docs/blog/log4j-zero-day/#affected-apache-log4j2-versions> 2.0 <= Apache log4j <= 2.14.1 Thanks in advance for your

[Mailman-Users] Re: is log4j2 leveraged in Mailman version 2.1.14-1?

@David Gibbs--thanks! That was my assumption but I appreciate the feedback and confirmation. @Carl Zwanzig-- excellent point, I've inherited this older version of Mailman and its definitely on my maintenance debt list to upgrade to ver 3+. 😊 Thanks again, John -Original Me

[Mailman-Users] Re: is log4j2 leveraged in Mailman version 2.1.14-1?

Good to know! I'll move this up to the front burner. ; ) -Original Message- From: Carl Zwanzig Sent: Friday, December 10, 2021 1:39 PM To: mailman-users@python.org Subject: [Mailman-Users] Re: is log4j2 leveraged in Mailman version 2.1.14-1? On 12/10/2021 1:28 PM, John Lake

[Mailman-Users] Troubleshooting steps for moderated messages (supposedly) sent without list admin approval?

had it resent for moderation and approved it through. The second message went out fine, but now the first message has also gone out without anyone approving it.” Thanks, John Lake Application Security Analyst University of Oregon -- Ma

[Mailman-Users] Re: Troubleshooting steps for moderated messages (supposedly) sent without list admin approval?

Thanks Odhiambo!! From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 12:51 PM To: John Lake Cc: "mailman-users@python.org" Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Troubleshooting steps for moderated messages (supposedly) sent without list admin approval? On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 10:

[Mailman-Users] Question on outputting all lists and list owners and a process for batch disabling of lists without an owner

you have leveraged to batch disable lists without a defined owner? Thanks in advance for the assistance, I really appreciate this community as I don’t have much Linux Fu and the GNU resources and assistance have been invaluable! Best, John

[Mailman-Users] Re: Question on outputting all lists and list owners and a process for batch disabling of lists without an owner

Thanks very much Bruce and Mark! Much appreciated, John On 5/27/22, 1:53 PM, "Mark Sapiro" wrote: On 5/27/22 12:47, Bruce Johnson via Mailman-Users wrote: > Well some guy named Mark supported one method in the past 8-) (which I found googling ‘how to disable a m

[Mailman-Users] Unwanted digest to moderator

I am an administrator and moderator for a Mailman 2.1.18 list. Some months ago I started getting frequent digests addressed to the -requests@<--> address. Why might this be happening and how can I stop it? John -- Mailman-Users mailin

[Mailman-Users] Re: Unwanted digest to moderator

Thanks, it seems to be sorted now. I does seem to have been to do with one of the subscribers. On 29/11/2022 18:54, Mark Sapiro wrote: On 11/29/22 08:00, John Talbut wrote: I am an administrator and moderator for a Mailman 2.1.18 list.  Some months ago I started getting frequent digests

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: autorespond_requests in 2.1x

nowledgement. We hacked the message a little to make it more obvious. (Old news now.) --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA Soggy mail is caused by postage dew. -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] h

Re: [Mailman-Users] Install issue on Mac OS 10.2.3

t. Do read the license agreement...there may be some things that turn you away. http://www.apple.com/ and click on the little Developer widget to get started. I'm not sure which of the three releases is best for building. (It's impossible to provide a direct URL to the download.) --J

Re: [Mailman-Users] Lotus Notes

Lotus never heard of the existence of an RFC. (It probably wasn't really that way.) --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/m

[Mailman-Users] Re: contents of qfiles/bad ?

t with /root as the current working directory OR as the directory referred to as ~. Since mailman can't write files into /root (on any sane system), bad things happen. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA

Re: [Mailman-Users] Posting restrictions

Unless your hosting firm has suppressed the header, you should see X-Mailman-Version: 2.0 or X-Mailman-Version: 2.1 etc. I don't know how to do that with mutt, which I've never used. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -

Re: [Mailman-Users] Question about changing the names of a list

bout it and so far they stay with the >existing >list! Thanks, Bill...that reminded me to verify that our service description for mailing list offerings advises people to be sure of the name when they request the list. And probably make the statement stronger if it is there --John (who

Re: [Mailman-Users] MS Exchange as a relay computer?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Ralf" == Ralf Hildebrandt > "Re: [Mailman-Users] MS Exchange as a relay computer?" > Tue, 28 Jan 2003 17:32:43 +0100 Ralf> * alex wetmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> The Mailman FAQ still recommends setting MAX_SMTP_RCPTS to 10

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1 mailpasswds error" > Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:39:57 -0500 BAW> see Warsaw's 4th Law. :) Pointer? ,[ Google ] | Your search - "Warsaw's 4th Law" - did not match any documents

Re: [Mailman-Users] Doubts

On Thursday 30 January 2003 10:12, Jon Carnes wrote: > I am amazed and astounded - and even more impressed with Cygwin! > How well does the Exim install work? Does it handle email quickly? > > I've got to try this one out. Exim (recent versions) seems happy with Cygwin...including the necessary

Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman" > Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:19:33 -0500 BAW> - Set the member_moderation_action to Reject and add a nice BAW> rejection notice text to the following text box. Say

Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw > "Re: [Mailman-Users] configuring Mailman" > Tue, 11 Feb 2003 01:28:40 -0500 BAW> In Mailman 2.1.x the way to customize the welcome message is BAW> to create a directory lists//en (assuming English B

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Will" == Will Yardley > "[Mailman-Users] Re: Do I need an MX Record" > Mon, 31 Mar 2003 17:04:35 -0800 Will> This isn't a mailman question, but rather a MTA Will> configuration question. Often useful are the tools at

[Mailman-Users] mailman authentication

ntings, and knows what I'd like to do, and has an idea, any suggestions would be appreciated. John signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pytho

[Mailman-Users] mailman api documented ?

would rock. John signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py

Re: [Mailman-Users] Starting qrunner for FreeBSD

There is not BSD specific documentation in there. I was thinking about submitting a patch for anyone who wants it... Basically, (I use OpenBSD), you need to set this stuff in /etc/rc.local and /etc/rc.shutdown instead of /etc/rc.d/init.d. BSDs are BSDish. Linux is SysVish. The layout of some of th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Starting qrunner for FreeBSD

> In FreeBSD the startup scripts are in /usr/local/etc/rc.d Submit a doc patch. :) - JMM On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Glenn Sieb wrote: > > John Michael Mars said: > > There is not BSD specific documentation in there. I was thinking about > submitting a patch for a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Starting qrunner for FreeBSD

It's called read the docs. You can't expect people to do EVERYTHING. Read the docs and THEN install or use a port. Help is for people that at least try to help themselves FIRST. That's my opinion. - JMM On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Amardeo Sarma wrote: > On 24 Jun 2003 at 21:57, John

RE: [Mailman-Users] Starting qrunner for FreeBSD

m > > -Original Message- > From: Amardeo Sarma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 4:09 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Starting qrunner for FreeBSD > > > On 24 Jun 2003 at 21:57, John Michael Mars wrote: > > > T

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Nuno" == Nuno Serra > "[Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists" > Wed, 13 Aug 2003 22:16:20 +0200 Nuno> Hi, SPAM email where the from address appears as the list Nuno> itself is bypassing the list rules for post

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > "Ed" == Ed Wilts > "Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists" > Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:09:46 -0500 Ed> What would one look like to allow, for example, a mail message Ed> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] to only come from an

Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >>>>> "jam" == John A Martin >>>>> "Re: [Mailman-Users] SPAM getting through on moderated lists" >>>>> Thu, 14 Aug 2003 12:34:21 -0400 jam> 2. Cause something like the followi

[Mailman-Users] install docs w/ mandrake RPM

oward some relevant docs? John-Mason Shackelford Software Developer Pearson Educational Measurement - eMeasurement Group 2510 North Dodge St. Iowa City, IA 52245 ph. 319-354-9200x6214 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://etest.ncspearso

Re: [Mailman-Users] disable subject_prefix, and log location

in /var/spool/mailman/logs/* Have a peek in /var/log/mailman That's where the mailman logs are hiding on our system (Mailman installed by another, not me...I would have preferred our usual place for logs). --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Mailman-Users] Re: Sobig forces unsubscribes

[EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't accomplish anything either (those messages get tossed unread). "Reliable mail delivery" has suffered blows from both the Spammers and the worm/virus crowd, and doesn't exist any more. It will be nice to retire and give up all my email accounts. --John

Re: [Mailman-Users] Can't access the mailman list in Mailman 2.1-8

/mailman >> >> it reverts back to >> >>http://$server/mailman/admin > > Do you happen to have a RedirectMatch in your apache config for /mailman? > If so, you might want to look at that. Thank you, Todd...I'll look at this after (Chinese, out

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

wherever) and subscribe it to your test list. (When the spam to the account becomes unbearable, abandon it.) --John -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http

Re: [Mailman-Users] PGP/Mime

> "Enno" == Enno Rehling > "[Mailman-Users] PGP/Mime" > Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:31:12 +0200 Enno> Mailman seems to re-wrap MIME messages in a way that Enno> destroys OpenPGP/Mime signed messages (see my own messages Enno> to this list). Is there any way I can fix that through

Re: [Mailman-Users] description becomes title

EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Which is all a bit weird. Any clues anyone? I "gave up" recently, and switched the ReplyTo: (the boss wants replies forced to the list) to Specific Address, addressing the list. I think the list description

[Mailman-Users] sendmail and mailman

he relay host itself? Thanks, -John -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/faqw-mm.py Searchable Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] sendmail and mailman

Since the canonical name of the machine is in the correct domain, I just put all of the list aliases in that file. Worked fine. Thanks for the suggestions though! -John > On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 07:44, John E.P. Hynes wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Here's my issue: &

Re: [Mailman-Users] A bit of a problem

ome/mailman/log/bounce reported. Is this a bug? I think so. Or, it's a "surprising artifact of legacy code." It's been adjusted in Mailman 2.1, coming soon. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Ignoring duplicate messages?

impossible to get people to change to something decent. And just when you get someone convinced, the Boss says "everyone will use Outhouse and nothing else". --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -- Mailma

[Mailman-Users] Re: Mailman not being nice...

gt;in my mm_cfg.py file. > >Thank you What did you have specified when the lists were created? If it was not what it is now, you'll need to do some fiddling with the older lists (since I haven't done such fiddling, I'm not the one to advise). --John -- John Baxter [EMA

[Mailman-Users] Re: several messages

o produce a working password, given the encrypted one, in half a day or so, by brute force (and without raising red flags by testing with the system in question). (The 8-character password limit inherent in using crypt() puts a nice constraint on the brute force method's maximum time.) --John

Re: [Mailman-Users] Member Passwords

t" cache when the clock was corrected). It's quite possible that a system running anacron is harder to confuse. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA [it logs; I saw]...I wonder what the Latin is for "it logs"...vidi is easy enough for I

Re: [Mailman-Users] Tell if a recipient reads the newsletter?

eceipt, and NEVER in a list. I would for personal email from friends, but my friends know better. --John -- John BaxterPort Ludlow, WA, USA I am NOT out of the office. I will respond if and when I get around to it. -- Mailman-Use

Re: [Mailman-Users] Newbie question: Aliases in postfix not being created

hen direct mail appropriately. The new list is ready for email when the ./newlist command finishes. See the Exim site for instructions on how do to it with Exim. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -- Mailman-User

Re: [Mailman-Users] question

wars the passwords are intended to help stop, PLUS it is open to digest vs message wars, no-mail wars, etc. (By sufficiently messing up the web server setup, you can force much of that to be done via email.) But in a smallish, friendly group, it works OK. --John (who thinks it's easier t

[Mailman-Users] Re: [SM-USERS] Bug against Mozilla?

At 11:07 -0800 2/3/2002, Ivan F. Poddubny wrote: >This is well-known Mozilla 0.9.7 bug. Check buglist on Mozilla.org for >more information. Workarond -- downgrade to 0.9.6 or use Opera/IE. Does the recent Mozilla 0.9.8 fix it? --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludl

Re: [Mailman-Users] moderated list and administrator

At 11:11 +0100 2/11/2002, Solignani Tiziano wrote: >Is there a way to define >an email address which never requires approval? yes...and it will work fine until someone notices that he or she can send anything at all to your list by forging the message so that it is from you. --John --

Re: [Mailman-Users] Changing the list password (when you do notknow it)

ich sets the site password, then return to the first paragraph. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users

Re: [Mailman-Users] changing request of subscription result page

vitare che terzi possano cancellarti senza il tuo consensoQuesta è una lista pubblica, questo significa che la lista dei membri è aperta a chiunque (ma noi oscuriamo gli indirizzi affinchè non siano facilmente identificabili dagli spammers). (I don't know whether the accented charac

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderated list: admin vs moderator

proval mechanism. Now, we're pretty much talking people rather than addresses (throw out the key if one gets compromised). The responses were all about various ways to implicitly approve addresses. No response that I recall seeing discussed digital signatures. Oh, well. --John -- John Baxt

Re: [Mailman-Users] Moderated list: admin vs moderator

ay*, procmail and gpg or some such combination would be the way (OK...over enough time to learn procmail, not "today" unless I hire it out). --John (last touched a procmail recipe about 6 years ago) -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] Regular Expressions

/regex.html You ought to be able to use regular expressions as they are in the version of Python which is in use to run Mailman. Currently, I think that means that the answer is "yes or no" unless we know that version number. --John -- John Baxter [EMAI

Re: [Mailman-Users] Regular Expressions

sion of Python is too old for what you want to do (I'm almost certain). Someone who actually knows can specify which version the redone regular expressions appeared in. --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] byte-compiling mm_cfg.py?

dify the .py file, then set its modified date back using touch. Don't do this for mission critical code.) --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -- Mailman-Users maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.pytho

Re: [Mailman-Users] Installation on Mac OSX

se" for more information. Do this (after the modern version of the above): import pwd print pwd.getpwall() Do you see all your NetInfo users? --John -- John Baxter [EMAIL PROTECTED] Port Ludlow, WA, USA -- Mailman-Users mailing list

<    6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   >