's name. I would use this setting to say:
FROM: Author_Name via Club Name
substituted "Club Name" for "List Name", and used
explicit reply_to_address instead of list address.
Best,
Dave Nathanson
Mac Medix
---
and
better then nothing. At the very least adding one more message header won't
cause any complaining.
Thoughts?
Best,
Dave Nathanson
Mac Medix
--
Mailman-Users mailing list Mailman-Users@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman
or To field. That's why up to now, I've opted for
the Reply-To to only contain the desired list address.
Best,
Dave Nathanson
Mac Medix
On May 12, 2014, at 9:32 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote:
> On 05/12/2014 08:45 PM, Dave Nathanson wrote:
>>
>> I saw a message today sen
o that's a savings of about $11 a year for
life. MACMEDIXFREEDOM What else is included? Tons! Check it out.
http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?250640/hosting.html
Best,
Dave Nathanson
Mac Medix
On Jul 20, 2014, at 4:38 AM, Russell Woodford wrote:
> Hi Peter, Mark and all
>
> I thi
ng the low
price & all the "unlimited everything" they offer, I'm very happy with mine.
Considering the price you have been paying, you will most likely need to pay
more to get out of this problem, but maybe not much more.
http://www.dreamhost.com/r.cgi?250640/hosting.html
B
I've spent almost 2 whole days reading the MailMan FAQ, Googleing and
testing theories/methods with a set of test-lists. I am using MailMan
2.1.12 installed at DreamHost.com. I do not have root access. Although
I can ssh into the server, I'm not good at writing shell scripts.
Sorry if this
er
versions. I just know that it's been over 2 years since 2.1.17 which has an
annoying omission due the the whole DEMARC thing.
What are the advantages of upgrading beyond 2.1.17?
How best to make a good case to convince them to upgrade their MailMan?
What version should I ask for?
be more aware.
Immensely frustrating, as almost half of our list members have sbcglobal or ATT
& are losing contact with our group.
Best,
Dave Nathanson
Mac Medix
> On Aug 26, 2022, at 10:36 PM, Jayson Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday I received a report from an A