[Mailman-Users] Re: Munge without CC or Reply-To

El mar, 16-03-2021 a las 15:28 -0700, Mark Sapiro escribió: > On 3/16/21 9:54 AM, Diez wrote: > > > > I'm trying to setup a list (I'm not the site admin), and I'd like > > to > > use Munge From setting, but I'd like not have Reply-To field or CC > > field, but I suspect is not possible. > > > One o

[Mailman-Users] Re: Munge without CC or Reply-To

Diez writes: > The initial idea was > get a list for an organization so members can't see email addresses of > the others This is what anonymous list does. > and only one member (let's say the owner) was allowed to send some > contents, This is what Privacy Options | Sender Filters is for.

[Mailman-Users] Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

I need to migrate my instance of mailman to a new server. Centos6 is going out of support, so I need to migrate to a centos7 server. I have been searching the lists and looked at https://wiki.list.org/x/4030682 but still have some questions. I am basically handed a new server that has Mailman &

[Mailman-Users] is there a short instruction guide available?

We are trying to determine the best methods of taking a long-working mailman list server, with 43 active lists, and 'moving' it behind an F5. We're not sure how mailman would handle inbound email from the F5... as part of our issue is we'd like to maintain the same URL for the frontend as we hav

[Mailman-Users] Re: is there a short instruction guide available?

On 3/17/2021 9:04 AM, Jeffrey Westgate wrote: We are trying to determine the best methods of taking a long-working mailman list server, with 43 active lists, and 'moving' it behind an F5. Unless I'm dreadfully mistaken, the f5 should be transparent to the traffic if the rules are set correctly.

[Mailman-Users] Re: Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

On 3/17/2021 8:32 AM, Bader, Robert (Bob) wrote: I am basically handed a new server that has Mailman & Apache installed. Danger are those current software? * Am I missing anything? Yes... * Also old server is version 2.1.12 and new version is version 2.1.15. will that be an

[Mailman-Users] Re: Munge without CC or Reply-To

On 3/17/21 5:49 AM, Diez wrote: > > With this scenario, any member could falsify a content corresponding to > the moderator and send it, all the headers would be the same, but > activating moderation we could detect these cases. See the "How to restrict the list so only authorized persons can po

[Mailman-Users] Re: Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

On 3/17/21 8:32 AM, Bader, Robert (Bob) wrote: > > For moving over mailman it looks like I can just: > > > * Have incoming mail held Our mail is scanned before it gets to the > server, so I can have the mail held while I perform the migration. > * Stop mailman service on new server

[Mailman-Users] Re: Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

Thanks for the info, So in working with our server team that latest package for centos7 is 2.1.15, However we are finding out that Rhel back ports for security fixes (https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/) So I am running 2.1.15 with the security patch’s up to and in 2.1.34???

[Mailman-Users] Re: Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

On 3/17/21 12:12 PM, Bader, Robert (Bob) wrote: > > Mailman 2.1.34 is the latest correct, is it still being developed? I thought > it was done and no longer being developed and patched but looking for that > stated somewhere. See, e.g., the release announcement for Mailman 2.1.34 at

[Mailman-Users] Re: Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

On 3/17/2021 2:12 PM, Bader, Robert (Bob) wrote: Thanks for the info, So in working with our server team that latest package for centos7 is 2.1.15, However we are finding out that Rhel back ports for security fixes (https://access.redhat.com/security/updates/backporting/) So I am running 2.1.

[Mailman-Users] Re: Migration to new server questions after having done research & testing ahead of time.

On 3/17/21 1:09 PM, Barry S. Finkel wrote: > > When I was administering Mailman on Ubuntu, I decided that I had to use > the Mailman source.  I looked at the Ubuntu patches, and most were > undocumented.  And one removed a library that, on occasion, was > required.  And I had no confidence that th