Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project

2020-02-29 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 16:28 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > Well, Steve channeled me earlier, so I'll return the favor. > > And did it with extreme precision and accuracy. Sorry if I created > any misunderstandings. > > The only thing I have to add is that mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project (was: Handling Munged From Addresses)

2020-02-29 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Thu, 2020-02-27 at 14:51 -0500, Bill Cole wrote: > On 27 Feb 2020, at 14:24, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > > Personally, I'd like to see the GNU Mailman project have a formal > > Mailman 2.3 release that supports Python3, I feel that there would be > > a > > lot of support for tha

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project

2020-02-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/28/20 11:28 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > Well, Steve channeled me earlier, so I'll return the favor. > > And did it with extreme precision and accuracy. Sorry if I created > any misunderstandings. None whatsoever, at least not from me ;) -- Mark Sapiro

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project

2020-02-29 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/29/20 7:02 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > If > a CSF/CSS is identified in Mailman v2.1.30 in May-2020, what will be > done to address it? I'd say it depend on the details of how serious the vulnerability is, how easy it is to exploit and how hard it is to fix. I am not oppos

Re: [Mailman-Users] The last release from the GNU Mailman project

2020-02-29 Thread Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users
On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 10:46 -0800, Mark Sapiro wrote: > On 2/29/20 7:02 AM, Jim Popovitch via Mailman-Users wrote: > > If > > a CSF/CSS is identified in Mailman v2.1.30 in May-2020, what will be > > done to address it? > > I'd say it depend on the details of how serious the vulnerability is, > how