Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.18 for RHEL 5

2020-02-17 Thread Dennis Putnam
On 2/16/2020 11:45 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Dennis Putnam writes: > > > Since migrating to mailman 3 on the latest RHEL is going to take some > > time, I need an interim solution to DMARC mitigation. I understand > > version 2.1.18 > > Why 2.1.18? Do you have that already installed? It

[Mailman-Users] Server Configuration 2.1.12

2020-02-17 Thread Dennis Putnam
I have mailman 2.1.12 installed on RHEL 7 (that is the latest version available in the RHEL 7 repository). When I try to access the mailman web pages (apache 2.4) I get the error: [Mon Feb 17 03:43:04.099892 2020] [authz_core:error] [pid 30156] [client 162.230.29.192:49655] AH01630: client denied

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.18 for RHEL 5

2020-02-17 Thread Bill Cole
On 17 Feb 2020, at 5:27, Dennis Putnam wrote: On 2/16/2020 11:45 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: Dennis Putnam writes: Since migrating to mailman 3 on the latest RHEL is going to take some time, I need an interim solution to DMARC mitigation. I understand version 2.1.18 Why 2.1.18? Do you

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.18 for RHEL 5

2020-02-17 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 2020-02-17 10:56, Bill Cole wrote: > RedHat has a policy of nailing down nominal versions of software with > each major RHEL release and then backporting whatever fixes they deem > important into their packages over the life of the major release, adding > their own subordinate versioning. I k

Re: [Mailman-Users] Server Configuration 2.1.12

2020-02-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/17/20 2:46 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote: > > [Mon Feb 17 03:43:04.099892 2020] [authz_core:error] [pid 30156] [client > 162.230.29.192:49655] AH01630: client denied by server configuration: > /usr/lib/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo > > Here is my mailman.conf file: > > # > #  httpd configuration setti

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.18 for RHEL 5

2020-02-17 Thread Lindsay Haisley (linode)
On Feb 17, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > >> On 2020-02-17 10:56, Bill Cole wrote: >> RedHat has a policy of nailing down nominal versions of software with >> each major RHEL release and then backporting whatever fixes they deem >> important into their packages over the life of t

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.18 for RHEL 5

2020-02-17 Thread dmaziuk via Mailman-Users
On 2/17/2020 11:24 AM, Lindsay Haisley (linode) wrote: This is common practice for all major distributions. The only way to keep up with upstream versions is to install from same from the git-go. This has its own pitfalls, but I do this for Mailman and have never had a problem. I'm still

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.18 for RHEL 5

2020-02-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
On 2/17/20 2:27 AM, Dennis Putnam wrote: > It turns out that the only version available for RHEL 7 is 2.1.12. > However, the mailman documentation indicates that also has DMARC > mitigation. What documentation? I assume Red Hat's. In any case, what you will have, as others have said, is 2.1.12 w

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.30rc1 released

2020-02-17 Thread Mark Sapiro
Over a month ago, I posted the following announcement particularly asking for i18n updates prior to the final release of Mailman 2.1. To date I have only received updates for the Japanese translation. If you can help update any of the other translations, please submit changes as indicated below.