Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner is generating mail - how to stop?

* Mark Sapiro : > It may be moot at this point, but there should be one and only one file > in qfiles/out with a .bak extension. > This is the backup of the message currently being processed by > OutgoingRunner. Remove or move aside this file. Then stop Mailman. > Stopping OutgoingRunner will stop

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner is generating mail - how to stop?

On 6/3/2010 4:00 AM, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > One of my list admins let a mail of 5MB through to a VERPified list of > more then 7000 member. Mailman is generating the mails at about one > message per second. > > This takes quite a while, during that time no other mails are getting > through. >

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner question

Lindsay Haisley wrote >I'm trying to test a list to which fairly long HTML-ized (ugh!) posts >will be posted by a customer. For testing, I have only a couple of >addresses (mine) on the subscriber list, but when I post, qrunner takes >like half an hour to push the posts through so I can see what'

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

Myron Kowalski wrote: >I think I found the (a) problem. There was a corrupted .db and .pck >file in the >qfiles/virgin directory. After I deleted those files, mailman would >start up w/o error >messages. But I don't see that that would stop outgoing mail, so there may also be a problem in th

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

Myron Kowalski wrote: > >I found one .pck out of place and move it. Restarted mailman with the >same error. >I moved the whole directory out of the way and restarted mailman-- >same error. Originally, you said the messages were being archived, so that indicated that IncomingRunner and ArchRunn

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

Myron Kowalski wrote: >On Oct 25, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Presumably, this is OutgoingRunner encountering the problem, because >> IncomingRunner and ArchRunner both have to work for messages to be >> archived. >> >> The problem may be as simple as some spurious file in qfiles/out

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

I think I found the (a) problem. There was a corrupted .db and .pck file in the qfiles/virgin directory. After I deleted those files, mailman would start up w/o error messages. --myron = Myron Kowalski MoCoSIN Network/Systems Administrator Moravian College [EMAI

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

On Oct 26, 2007, at 7:58 AM, Myron Kowalski wrote: > On Oct 25, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Myron Kowalski wrote: >> >>> I noticed that messages were not going out to my mailing lists. When >>> I restarted mailman, this comes up. Any mail sent to the list is >>> being archived, >>> b

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

On Oct 25, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Myron Kowalski wrote: > >> I noticed that messages were not going out to my mailing lists. When >> I restarted mailman, this comes up. Any mail sent to the list is >> being archived, >> but is not going to the members. >> >> Traceback (most recent

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

Myron Kowalski wrote: >I noticed that messages were not going out to my mailing lists. When >I restarted mailman, this comes up. Any mail sent to the list is >being archived, >but is not going to the members. > >Traceback (most recent call last): > File "/users/mailman/bin/qrunner", line 270,

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner refuses to pass mail to users

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:02:52AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> And what is in the smtp-failure log? >> > >This stuff: > >Aug 19 13:09:18 2007 (7258) delivery to [EMAIL PROTECTED] failed with code -1: >(111, 'Connection refused') >Aug 19 13:09:18 2007 (7258) deliv

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner refuses to pass mail to users

On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:02:52AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >I have the following setup: > > > >Postfix -> Dspam -> Procmail -> Mailman -> Users > > > >I've tried taking Dspam out of the equation, but that did not change a thing. > > > >When users send to a mailing list,

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner refuses to pass mail to users

On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:02:52AM -0700, Mark Sapiro wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >I have the following setup: > > > >Postfix -> Dspam -> Procmail -> Mailman -> Users > > > >I've tried taking Dspam out of the equation, but that did not change a thing. > > > >When users send to a mailing list,

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner refuses to pass mail to users

[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >I have the following setup: > >Postfix -> Dspam -> Procmail -> Mailman -> Users > >I've tried taking Dspam out of the equation, but that did not change a thing. > >When users send to a mailing list, the message appears to be deilvered to >mailman. >However, mailman does not

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

Joern Allmers wrote: >> >> In the error log theres nothing every 15 minutes, only errors that occured >> while I did the setup. The qrunner log shows only >> May 03 09:30:01 2006 (24268) Master qrunner detected subprocess exit >> (pid: 14115, sig: 9, sts: None, class: VirginRunner, slice: 1/1) >> [

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

Hi, Sorry for the repost but I still try to tell qrunner to be more verbose (and of course to stop restarting every 15min) so *any* hints? Thanks Joern Am Mittwoch, 3. Mai 2006 10:07 schrieb Joern Allmers: > Hi, > > > Is there any more in the qrunner log than was in the original post > > (e.g.

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

Hi, > Is there any more in the qrunner log than was in the original post > (e.g., messages from the qrunners indicating a received signal)? Is > there anything in Mailman's error log? In the error log theres nothing every 15 minutes, only errors that occured while I did the setup. The qrunner lo

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

Carl Zwanzig wrote: >In a flurry of recycled electrons, Joern Allmers wrote: >> >> I don't think so. In cron.d theres no entry for it. Any idea why the >> qrunners >> are stopt? > >In answer to the second question, you can only have one of each qrunner >at a time, so if you start a new master,

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

In a flurry of recycled electrons, Joern Allmers wrote: > > Perchange, is qrunner being run every 15 minutes in a cron job? Newer > > mailmans just start qrunner once at boot time and it deals with it's own > > scheduling. > > I don't think so. In cron.d theres no entry for it. Any idea why the qr

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2006 21:54 schrieben Sie: > In a flurry of recycled electrons, Joern Allmers wrote: > > Mailman works great and everything could be fine if not it was restarting > > every 15 minutes: > > Perchange, is qrunner being run every 15 minutes in a cron job? Newer > mailmans just start

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner restarts every 15 minutes

In a flurry of recycled electrons, Joern Allmers wrote: > Mailman works great and everything could be fine if not it was restarting > every 15 minutes: Perchange, is qrunner being run every 15 minutes in a cron job? Newer mailmans just start qrunner once at boot time and it deals with it's own s

Re: [Mailman-Users] QRUNNER processes running high on CPU rates

In a flurry of recycled electrons, Chance Eppinette wrote: > The CPU rate is hovering around 45% for the qrunner bounce process. > The list has purged out about 1100 disabled subscribers over this weekend, > but for some reason is still churning away about nothing - it seems. Clearing the member

Re: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner Error

Young, Darren wrote: >Mailman 2.1.5 on RedHat EL 3.0... Getting the following error, any >thoughts? > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]# ./qrunner -r Outgoing:0:1 -v >Traceback (most recent call last): > File "./qrunner", line 270, in ? >main() > File "./qrunner", line 230, in main >qrunner.run()

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running but not flushing qfiles/in

On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 12:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hey Mark, thanks for the reply. Yeah I figured that the missing qrunners were > the problem but there was no log entry that was revealing. Then I read in the > mailmanctl script that restart doesn't kill the parent ps, just the qrunners. > So

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running but not flushing qfiles/in

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Mark Sapiro wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >On Slackware 9.1 (kernel 2.4.22), Mailman 2.1.5, Python 2.3.4, Sendmail 8.12.10: > > > >ps shows - > > > > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND > >26185 ?S 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections > >26187 ?S

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running but not flushing qfiles/in

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >On Slackware 9.1 (kernel 2.4.22), Mailman 2.1.5, Python 2.3.4, Sendmail 8.12.10: > >ps shows - > > PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAND >26185 ?S 0:00 sendmail: accepting connections >26187 ?S 0:00 sendmail: Queue [EMAIL PROTECTED]:25:00 for >/var

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner using 99% of my CPU time? (RESOLVED)

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner using 99% of my CPU time? At 3:36 PM -0700 2004-09-10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > None of these are helping, and qrunner -r All is still running at 99% cpu > usage. You

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner using 99% of my CPU time?

At 3:36 PM -0700 2004-09-10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: None of these are helping, and qrunner -r All is still running at 99% cpu usage. You read everything at , and all the threads that it links to? What's in your lo

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner using 99% of my CPU time?

ahiro Jim Tittsler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 09/07/2004 05:42 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner using 99% of my CPU time? On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 12:20:29PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I don't know why, but qrunne

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner using 85% cpu

At 11:57 AM -0700 2004-07-23, Everett Littles wrote: I noticed that none of the messages being sent to Mailman are being distributed. See . I tried stopping and starting Mailman a few times with no success in delivery. I

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

This will typically happen when you run "mailmanctl" command as a non-mailman user. Make sure that the /etc/rc.d/mailman script runs the "maimanctl stop/start/restart" command as "su -c mailmanctl mailman start/stop/restart" Or add a script to /etc/rc.d/rc.local which runs mailmanctl start comman

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

At 11:16 AM -0500 2004-06-29, Michael Sullivan wrote: I issued the "service mailman restart" command to which it gave the the output: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailman]# service mailman restart PID unreadable in: /var/mailman/data/master-qrunner.pid [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/mailman/

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner: Low level smtp error

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 3:25 PM -0500 2004-06-25, Doug Hughes wrote: > > > adding MX did not help. still same error when qrunner runs. > > > > And, I should have noticed this before. I have another server running > > potato (mostly) with 2.0.13 and no issues (even though t

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner: Low level smtp error

On Sat, 26 Jun 2004, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 3:25 PM -0500 2004-06-25, Doug Hughes wrote: > > > adding MX did not help. still same error when qrunner runs. > > > > And, I should have noticed this before. I have another server running > > potato (mostly) with 2.0.13 and no issues (even though t

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner: Low level smtp error

At 3:25 PM -0500 2004-06-25, Doug Hughes wrote: adding MX did not help. still same error when qrunner runs. And, I should have noticed this before. I have another server running potato (mostly) with 2.0.13 and no issues (even though the source domain has no MX). Have you looked at the logs to

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner: Low level smtp error

On Fri, 25 Jun 2004, Brad Knowles wrote: > At 9:12 AM -0500 2004-06-25, Doug Hughes wrote: > > > initial mail queues to the daemon ok and then goes into the qfiles > > directory, but then mailman qrunner processes it and I get this: > > > > Jun 23 17:08:05 2004 (19334) Low level smtp error: (-2

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner: Low level smtp error

At 9:12 AM -0500 2004-06-25, Doug Hughes wrote: initial mail queues to the daemon ok and then goes into the qfiles directory, but then mailman qrunner processes it and I get this: Jun 23 17:08:05 2004 (19334) Low level smtp error: (-2, 'Name or service not known'), msgid: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

At 6:28 AM +0100 2004/05/20, Richard Barrett wrote: From the dim and distant past I recollect that reducing the archive period from say a month to a week for lists that were challenged in this way could help. ISTR that this issue has come up a few times on the list, so I've put this into the F

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

On 20 May 2004, at 00:14, Paul Smith wrote: OK, after more poking and prodding, it looks like the problem is related to the private//database directory. The "article" file here for the list that was causing the problems was 44M, the author was 51K, date was 41K, subject was 55K, and thread was 4

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

OK, after more poking and prodding, it looks like the problem is related to the private//database directory. The "article" file here for the list that was causing the problems was 44M, the author was 51K, date was 41K, subject was 55K, and thread was 42k. I moved all those files aside and ran qr

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

Poking at this a bit more I have more data. It seems like whenever mail is sent to one list in particular, the qrunner script hangs up for a very long time processing that mail. I think it's that list because I see the lock for that list existing for a long time with the same pid in the locks dir

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

At 12:05 AM -0400 2004/05/19, Paul Smith wrote: I was just wondering whether anyone had any debugging tips, like checking for messages stuck in the queue that would be causing this problem, or lock files that might be breaking somet

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

%% Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: bk> At 5:41 PM -0400 2004/05/18, Paul Smith wrote: >> I know this is a really old version, but I'm hoping someone has some >> hints for me on troubleshooting this: upgrading to 2.1.4 or 2.1.5 is on >> my TODO list but... bk> Problem is, runawa

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner running away (Mailman 2.0.11)

At 5:41 PM -0400 2004/05/18, Paul Smith wrote: I know this is a really old version, but I'm hoping someone has some hints for me on troubleshooting this: upgrading to 2.1.4 or 2.1.5 is on my TODO list but... Problem is, runaway Python processes are something that I believe 2.1.5 was created to

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

: tikkliknl CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Onderwerp: Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner On 6 May 2004, at 22:00, tikkliknl wrote: > Well it was a new install, but there was an old not used version > pressent. > i installed python 2.3.3 Did you install it in the same location as and replacing any previou

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

Well it was a new install, but there was an old not used version pressent. i installed python 2.3.3 looking at ps -aux i see this: mailman 28884 0.1 0.9 5964 4792 ?S22:55 0:00 python2.3 /home/mailman/bin/mailmanctl -s start mailman 28885 2.8 0.8 5736 4600 ?S22:55

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

On 6 May 2004, at 22:00, tikkliknl wrote: Well it was a new install, but there was an old not used version pressent. i installed python 2.3.3 Did you install it in the same location as and replacing any previous version of python on the system? looking at ps -aux i see this: mailman 28884 0.

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

On 6 May 2004, at 21:12, Steffan wrote: Hello did a new install of mailman 2.1.4 now cron gives this error File "/home/mailman/cron/qrunner", line 96 print >> fd, _(__doc__) ^ SyntaxError: invalid syntax any idees what version of python are you running? the README says It

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lockup / mass moderation (solved)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just as a followup to my post explaining how I solved the problem. The lockup didn't have something to do with the overfull moderation queue. There was a 8 MB big file in the qfiles/ directory. The size was not that unusual and Mailman normally has

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lockup / mass moderation

> "Stephan" == Stephan Uhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Stephan> Is there another way to do such mass moderation? I tried Stephan> to move away the files in the data/ directory but then Stephan> Mailman complains about missing them, so I guess I have Stephan> to do it the "

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner fails to start

(Following up with a self-post just for archival purposes) :: I'm getting this error when I try to start the mailman qrunner daemon after :: upgrading to 2.1.3 from 2.0.13. Actually, I get this 10x, each one causing :: the qrunner process to die and spawn anew: :: File "/usr/local/mailman/Mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner

At 12:22 PM + 2003/11/30, John Poltorak wrote: Is there any alternative to running qrunner via cron? In mailman 2.1.x, qrunner is not run via cron. The qrunner processes are left continually running, separate from system facilities such as cron. I am used to Majordomo which just sends o

RE: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner with 98% load

> > The pck files look fine, It is e.g. a message to the normal list > > address. > > Yet this message hangs out in the queue? Or rather the queue > is stalled out on it? > > If you delete this message and send a different message to a > different list what happens? Normal messages just go th

Re: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner with 98% load

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 12:01, Wim Bonis wrote: > I did all this already, there is nothing in the logfiles, even if i > start with "qrunner -v -o -r Outgoing" > > There also no traffic/logs for the MTA > > The pck files look fine, It is e.g. a message to the normal list > address. Yet this messag

Re: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner with 98% load

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 17:46, Jon Carnes wrote: > On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 06:26, Wim Bonis wrote: > > Hello List, > > > > I just upgrades my Server to mailman 2.1.3, and it basicly works, but some > > messages trigger a 98% load of qrunner. > > > > The messages are in qfiles/out and get renamed more

Re: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner with 98% load

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 06:26, Wim Bonis wrote: > Hello List, > > I just upgrades my Server to mailman 2.1.3, and it basicly works, but some > messages trigger a 98% load of qrunner. > > The messages are in qfiles/out and get renamed more than once in a second. > There is no log entry in logs or sy

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner with over 90% CPU

Jon Carnes wrote: Paul, I have never seen this on a sendmail install. Maybe your problem is a different one. Perhaps I miss read the issue. Give that my runaway is Python I suspect this is the case. Sorry. I posted about my problem a while back, see

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner with over 90% CPU

Richard Barrett wrote: Take a look at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17786.html Of course it's not just postfix, it bites me about once a week with sendmail. I watch it and kill the PID when it happens, but it's a PITA. Any chance of a patch? I know it's in the CVS, bu

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner with over 90% CPU

On Saturday 09 August 2003 20:29, Jens Gutzeit wrote: > Now I've seen that qrunner has a high CPU usage, I had restartet mailman > but that doens't change anything. Hmm, sorry I hate answering my own mails ;) Richard Barret had pointed me at http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17786

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner with over 90% CPU

Paul, I have never seen this on a sendmail install. Maybe your problem is a different one. what version of python are your running, and what is the OS? From a command line type: python look at the first line printed: Python 2.2.2 Type a cntl-d to get out of python Jon Carnes On Sun,

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner with over 90% CPU

On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 22:09, Paul H Byerly wrote: > Jon Carnes wrote: > >Paul, I have never seen this on a sendmail install. Maybe your problem is > >a different one. > > Perhaps I miss read the issue. Give that my runaway is Python I > suspect this is the case. Sorry. > > I poste

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner with over 90% CPU

Take a look at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg17786.html On Saturday, August 9, 2003, at 07:29 pm, Jens Gutzeit wrote: Hi all, I'm new to mailman, I've it running on my mailserver for 2 internal mailinglists with low traffic (10-40 mails per day), nothing special, most text

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner looping on confirm message

On 28 May 2003, Jon Carnes wrote: > Make sure you local MTA correctly identifies the local user as bogus. > > Postfix by default does not correctly identify a user as being missing > and instead sends a lesser error indicating that the user is just > temporarily unavailable. > > Modify your MT

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner looping on confirm message

Make sure you local MTA correctly identifies the local user as bogus. Postfix by default does not correctly identify a user as being missing and instead sends a lesser error indicating that the user is just temporarily unavailable. Modify your MTA to report the bogus user correctly, then Mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner Outgoing getting stuck?

Hi, Looks like your message db file in queue is somehow corrupted. Try ~/bin/dumpdb .{db,pck} and find oddities. Tokio Daniel A. Jacobs wrote: Running Python 2.2.2, Mailman 2.1.1, Sendmail. For all lists, messages make it to the archives, but get stuck in qfiles/out. If I run 'qrunner -r out

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner Outgoing getting stuck? - includingrelevant code

This is where the assertion is being thrown: ~mailman/Mailman/Queue/Switchboard.py, line 148: # Between 2.1b4 and 2.1b5, the `rejection-notice' key in the metadata # was renamed to `rejection_notice', since dashes in the keys are not # supported in METAFMT_ASCII. if data.has_key('reject

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner Outgoing getting stuck?

I also should mention that I am running this on FreeBSD-4.3. > DEFAULT_CHARSET = None is how mine is set. > > This is driving me crazy. Has no one else ever seen this error? > > > -Original Message- > > From: Jon Carnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > I just peeked at the code, but j

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner Outgoing getting stuck?

DEFAULT_CHARSET = None is how mine is set. This is driving me crazy. Has no one else ever seen this error? > -Original Message- > From: Jon Carnes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I just peeked at the code, but just for a second (have to get to bed...) > and I have a WAG. What is your DEF

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner Outgoing getting stuck?

I just peeked at the code, but just for a second (have to get to bed...) and I have a WAG. What is your DEFAULT_CHARSET set to in ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py (or Default.py)? Mine is: DEFAULT_CHARSET = None Hope its not a waste of time - Jon Carnes On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 12:21, Daniel A. Jaco

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner troubles after install: "Uncaught runner exception"

> "ANV" == A N Varady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: ANV> ./configure --with-cgi-gid=99 --with-mail-gid=mailman ANV> --prefix=/home/mailman --with-python=/usr/local/bin/python2.2 ANV> TypeError: isinstance() arg 2 must be a class or type Be sure that the python2.2 above points to P

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems

At 19:06 28/11/2002, fish wrote: Richard wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you say cron is executing the > qrunner, which > is sending out mail to your lists subscriber, but you are getting 'error' > messages logged each time. > > You might get more help if you repost to mailman-users list

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems

A search threw up the following link which seems to be relevant http://mail.python.org/pipermail/mailman-users/2001-November/015556.html Best of luck At 19:06 28/11/2002, fish wrote: Richard wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you say cron is executing the > qrunner, which > is sending out

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems

Richard wrote: > If I understand you correctly, you say cron is executing the > qrunner, which > is sending out mail to your lists subscriber, but you are getting 'error' > messages logged each time. > > You might get more help if you repost to mailman-users list giving an > example of exactly wha

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems

ate [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Richard Barrett > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 6:09 AM > To: fish; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems > > > At 00

RE: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems

[EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Richard Barrett > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 6:09 AM > To: fish; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems > > > At 00:26 28/11/2002, fish wrote: > >I am still have the authentica

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner problems

At 00:26 28/11/2002, fish wrote: I am still have the authentication problems with qrunner and, since nobody seems to know what the problem is or how to fix it, thought that I would ask what exactly does qrunner do? I can tell that the cron.d/mailman script is calling /usr/lib/mailman/cron/qrunner,

RE: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner error

I am also having qrunner problems, but they have to do with the /etc/cron.d/mailman that tries to run. I am getting an authentication error in my logs, (Nov 24 22:03:01 livingsky CRON[27016]: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.) and was wondering (after someone else told me

RE: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner error

I am also having qrunner problems, but they have to do with the /etc/cron.d/mailman that tries to run. I am getting an authentication error in my logs, (Nov 24 22:03:01 livingsky CRON[27016]: Authentication service cannot retrieve authentication info.) and was wondering (after someone else told me

Re: [Mailman-Users] Qrunner error (locks, maybe?)

Your logs tell it all;) Check the permissions on the files, I believe there's a permcheck script in the mailman directory.. Run that as root. On Sunday 24 November 2002 8:50 pm, Victor Allen wrote: > Background: > > Debian Stable with Postfix as MTA and Apache as webserver. > > After apt-get insta

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner import error on regex module

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 12:34:51PM -0600, Dave Dribin wrote: > Actually, I just thought of theory. Prior to Oct. 10, all messages > sent just went through. There were no detained messages, i.e. qrunner > had nothing to do. Since then, 3 messages have been "detained" for > the admin to look at.

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner unexpected EOF

> "MF" == Matt Filizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MF> We switched from using SMTPDirect to Sendmail because for some MF> reason certin accounts were being set to nomail. Presumably MF> this was because Mailman was unable to connect to their MF> server, and assumed it was do

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner unexpected EOF

We switched from using SMTPDirect to Sendmail because for some reason certin accounts were being set to nomail. Presumably this was because Mailman was unable to connect to their server, and assumed it was down. (that is only a guess) I say that because using Sendmail it has not had that p

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner unexpected EOF

> "MF" == Matt Filizzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MF> Just as an update, what the problem was is someone subscribed MF> with an ' in their email address. (ex. o'[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Does MF> anyone know if this is valid for email addresses? I couldn't MF> find any mention in

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner unexpected EOF

On Mon, 14 Oct 2002, Matt Filizzi wrote: > Just as an update, what the problem was is someone subscribed with > an ' in their email address. (ex. o'[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Does anyone know > if this is valid for email addresses? It is valid. > I couldn't find any mention in the RFC about it. See

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner unexpected EOF

Just as an update, what the problem was is someone subscribed with an ' in their email address. (ex. o'[EMAIL PROTECTED]) Does anyone know if this is valid for email addresses? I couldn't find any mention in the RFC about it. Jon Carnes wrote: > Check the log files for mailman. > > Check th

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner unexpected EOF

Check the log files for mailman. Check the space on the server and make sure none of your volumes is too full. Then check your lists for the latest subscribers (you should be able to see the new subscribers in the log files). See if someone subscribed using a "full name" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> comb

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

on 10/9/02 11:03 AM, Jon Carnes at [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Just to remove any thought of rights issues, how about setting the > rights to that file so that it is read/writable to all. > > The current rights should look like this: > -rw-rw-r-- mailman mailman They do now. But they didn't

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

On Wed, 2002-10-09 at 00:37, Chris Lawson wrote: > admin(8367): fp = open(self.__filename, 'w') > admin(8367): IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: > '/home/mailman/lists/test/request.db' > Just to remove any thought of rights issues, how about setting the rights to that file so that it is

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

on 10/8/02 2:01 PM, Jon Carnes aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 23:08, Chris Lawson wrote: > >>> Are the proper directories setup as Set-gid? >> >> Um... a bit of a knowledge blind spot for me. The directory of a given >> private list archive is mailman.mailman. > > In the

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

On Tue, 2002-10-08 at 08:28, Chris Lawson wrote: > > Another bit of wierdness. There are a ton of .msg and .db files piled up in > /var/spool/mailman/qfiles > > Or is that normal? Not normal. You might try running qrunner by hand and see what happens: su mailman /usr/bin/python -S ~mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

On Mon, 2002-10-07 at 23:08, Chris Lawson wrote: > > Are the proper directories setup as Set-gid? > > Um... a bit of a knowledge blind spot for me. The directory of a given > private list archive is mailman.mailman. In the INSTALL file for Mailman it details some setup directions: Make sure t

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

on 10/7/02 7:27 PM, Jon Carnes aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hmmm, interesting error. Have you run ~mailman/bin/check_perms ? Are > the proper directories setup as Set-gid? Have you run out of space on > any of your volumes? Another bit of wierdness. There are a ton of .msg and .db files pile

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

on 10/7/02 7:27 PM, Jon Carnes aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hmmm, interesting error. Have you run ~mailman/bin/check_perms ? Yes. "No problems found." > Are the proper directories setup as Set-gid? Um... a bit of a knowledge blind spot for me. The directory of a given private list archive is

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

Hmmm, interesting error. Have you run ~mailman/bin/check_perms ? Are the proper directories setup as Set-gid? Have you run out of space on any of your volumes? > I'm running mailman 2.0.13-0.7.0 aka > the RedHat RPM version of 2.0.13 on RedHat 7.0 > > I just sent a message to my test list, and

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

on 10/7/02 10:47 AM, Jon Carnes aka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > This one should be in the FAQ if it is not already. Leaping before I look, once again. Of course it is. I followed the advice and checked for a running qrunner. There was none. I went to /usr/share/mailman/locks/ and deleted *a ton*

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner lock

This one should be in the FAQ if it is not already. This is normal in Mailman version 2.0.x which you are *probably* running (you didn't tell us your version or really anything about your system - shame on you!) This version of Mailman uses a cron job to launch qrunner every minute - but if qrun

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner caught SIGINT. Stopping.

That qrunner log is completely normal. It's what you expect from a "mailmanctl restart". -Barry -- Mailman-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-users Mailman FAQ: http://www.python.org/cgi-bin/f

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner error

This error is a known problem if you are using an older version of Python than 2.0 and the subject of prior postings to this list. Installing Mailman 2.0.13 should cure it: the Mailman 2.0.13 the release note says: This release fixes some Python 1.5.2 incompatibilities that crept into Mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner crash with 2.0.12

G.Armour Van Horn writes: > Locate the two oldest files in /qfiles and move them out of the directory > (or delete them if the .msg file appears to be unimportant). At least in my > case the problem was that the oldest message was damaged and there was no > body. I'm working on the assumption th

Re: [Mailman-Users] qrunner crash with 2.0.12

Locate the two oldest files in /qfiles and move them out of the directory (or delete them if the .msg file appears to be unimportant). At least in my case the problem was that the oldest message was damaged and there was no body. I'm working on the assumption that the lack of a message body is wha

  1   2   >