Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being sent with messages.

On 11/02/2015 02:25 AM, Adam Morris wrote: > Hi all, > > most messages sent to lists seem to have some sort of attachment. > If I go to non digest options and turn on the feature to scrub > attachments if messages are sent using html there is no body to the > message. See the FAQ article at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments sent with Apple Mail being stripped

On 08/15/2015 05:57 PM, Nick Tonkin wrote: > Hi all, I'm having a problem with mailman stripping attachments from > messages sent with Apple Mail. It looks like the content-type is > multipart/related, but I have added that to my list of allowed > content-types and the jpeg still gets removed. Any

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not getting through at random...

On 06/21/2015 10:55 AM, Nick Stevens via Mailman-Users wrote: > Hi All, > I'm new to the list - I did search the archives, but cannot find anything > covering my specific case. In the future and when following up, please post from your subscribed (...@gmail.com) address, not ...@googlemail.com. O

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments AND no-attachments...

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, Mark Sapiro wrote: > > Richard Troy wrote: > > > >In sum, it would be _fantastic_ if list subscribers have an > >option to receive or not receive attachments on a per-user basis, much as > >users can now elect to recieve digests. But, as that option doesn't appear > >to exist

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments AND no-attachments...

Richard Troy wrote: > >In sum, it would be _fantastic_ if list subscribers have an >option to receive or not receive attachments on a per-user basis, much as >users can now elect to recieve digests. But, as that option doesn't appear >to exist, I was thinking I could facilitate the same effect by u

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments dir question

Savoy, Jim wrote: > >I was wrong - an attachment directory was indeed created for my second >message as well. >In looking at the creation dates for that list, they always seem to be >created sometime >the next day after 3:00 am. Since the only cron job I run at that time for >Mailman is >senddigest

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments dir question

Thanks Stephen. I was wrong - an attachment directory was indeed created for my second message as well. In looking at the creation dates for that list, they always seem to be created sometime the next day after 3:00 am. Since the only cron job I run at that time for Mailman is senddigests, I guess

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: >Kikuchi-san, Mark-san, > >I will ask the customer to consider patching it. > >Thanks a million!!! > >Best Regards, > >Tokio Kikuchi wrote: >> (10/03/04 11:47), Masaharu Kawada wrote: >> >>> Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, >>> >>> Thank you very much for your help. >>> >>> Just

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Kikuchi-san, Mark-san, I will ask the customer to consider patching it. Thanks a million!!! Best Regards, Tokio Kikuchi wrote: (10/03/04 11:47), Masaharu Kawada wrote: Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, Thank you very much for your help. Just to make sure, about the patch, is it just need to be

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

(10/03/04 11:47), Masaharu Kawada wrote: > Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, > > Thank you very much for your help. > > Just to make sure, about the patch, is it just need to be modified in the > way you mentioned? Which means that it should be look like below. Yes, its OK. > > # vi /usr/lib/python2.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hi Mark-san, Kikuchi-san, Thank you very much for your help. Just to make sure, about the patch, is it just need to be modified in the way you mentioned? Which means that it should be look like below. # vi /usr/lib/python2.4/email/Charset.py -- 243 def convert(self, s): 244

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hi, (10/03/04 1:58), Mark Sapiro wrote: > Masaharu Kawada wrote: >> >> There is one thing that I wonder, is that if the charset.py is done with >> that patch, what the current digest.mbox exsisted under lists/ >> are supposed to be? Do they need to be deleted or not? My point on >> this is that on

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >There is one thing that I wonder, is that if the charset.py is done with >that patch, what the current digest.mbox exsisted under lists/ >are supposed to be? Do they need to be deleted or not? My point on >this is that once the patch is done, is there nothing else to do to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hello Kikuchi-san, As far as I checked the error messages and compared with each one, The problem of my customer's seems to be almost the same as one posted to the thread written in the last Kikuchi-san's email. There is one thing that I wonder, is that if the charset.py is done with that patch,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hello kikuchi-san, Thank you for your response with a precious information. Since I am a beginner for mailman, any comments/suggestions such as this kind of thing are very helpful for me. Including what Mark-san have been doing for me and you have done for me as well, I really appreciate the coop

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

(10/03/03 16:54), Masaharu Kawada wrote: > Hi Mark-san, > > I got a reply from the customer, but it was not possbile for the customer > to provide the whole digest.mbox to us due to their policy. However, > sevral parts of the error log and digest.mbox's content have been provided. > As for the e

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Hi Mark-san, I got a reply from the customer, but it was not possbile for the customer to provide the whole digest.mbox to us due to their policy. However, sevral parts of the error log and digest.mbox's content have been provided. As for the error messages, please see the attachment. And as fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your response. I was kind of misunderstanding about what the send_digest() does before, but I now got better knowledge on it because of your explanations for me. I very much appreciate it!! I have asked the customer for providing the digest.mbox(s) to us and wai

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >So, it doesn't matter if the senddigest fais or not, there are no >retries. And, >senddigest via cron runs only once a day at noon. However, whenever >messages posted to the list, send_digest() will called based on the size of >digest_size_threshhold, and try to send dige

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your respose. There are no retries per se. The list has a setting digest_size_threshhold (on its Digest options page). When a post arrives that makes the digest.mbox bigger than digest_size_threshhold, a digest is triggered immediately. In this case, the digest

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >I am sorry that I would like to know one more thing about >digestable in advance. > >>>--- >>>xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error: >>>invalid character .. >>>xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error:

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, I am sorry that I would like to know one more thing about digestable in advance. --- xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error: invalid character .. xxx xx xx:xx:xx 2010 (2129) send_digests() failed: EUC-JP decoding error: invalid character .. xx

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > > >There was no need to turn off digestable and archive if they were only > >going to be turned on again. > >I did some research and found information that it is necessary to disable >those options if you want to delete attachments manually, otherwise >something >unclaim m

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your help. I will try to get all of the digest.mbox located on under lists/LISTNAME/ from the customer. Though it might be difficult since digest.mbox consists confidential information for the customer. I will update as soon as I get the result from the custom

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark-san, Thank you very much for your help. >There was no need to turn off digestable and archive if they were only >going to be turned on again. I did some research and found information that it is necessary to disable those options if you want to delete attachments manually, otherwise somet

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Mark Sapiro wrote: > > I consider this behavior to be a bug. I'll look into fixing it. I think > what I'll need to do is just move the digest.mbox aside and log an > error message. It would be better if I could just bypass the bad > message, but that may be difficult. I have created a bug report

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments are unexpectedly re-created.

Masaharu Kawada wrote: > >Firtst of all, one of my customer wanted to delete attachments to >make more disk spaces on the server. The server's disk resource >was getting full because the size of the directory for attachments >was very big. So the customer did the following works first. > >Digest op

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments renamed in archives

Gruver, Sandi wrote: >I have this line in the mm_cfg.py file: >SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION = True, but attachments (.pdf) are >being renamed to .obj. > >Can you please give a big hint as to what do I need to do to fix this? Do the MIME headers of the attachment have a Content-Di

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

Edwin Shao wrote: > >So, that's what I thought the problem might be, but I use my school's >Mailman server as well and they don't have this problem. That is, I can send >HTML messages to the list and also have footers enabled. How do I enable >that function for my Mailman server? If you are sendi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

So, that's what I thought the problem might be, but I use my school's Mailman server as well and they don't have this problem. That is, I can send HTML messages to the list and also have footers enabled. How do I enable that function for my Mailman server? On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 8:14 PM, Mark Sap

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Added to All Messages I Send

Edwin Shao wrote: > >Sorry if this has been asked before. I just spent 4 hours browsing the >archive and FAQs and couldn't resolve my question. Every time I send a mail >to my list, it appears like this: > >* > >*-Inline Attachment Follows- > >___

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

I promised I would report back on this issue, and can now confirm that with the filtering settings suggested by Mark, the posts from "office man" and those from "excite man" both get delivered by Mailman correctly, although some MUAs have problems visualizing those from "office man". Therefore, th

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

Con Wieland wrote: > >On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >> If you want to accept any text/plain parts from the message or an >> attached (forwarded as attachment) message and likewise for PDFs and >> not accept anything else, set filter_mime_types empty and >> pass_mime_types to >>

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Con Wieland wrote: >> >> On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> >>> Con Wieland wrote: >>> My questions are, why am I getting the html attachments? >>> >>> >>> Because the sender's MUA is sending them and your content >>> filte

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

Con Wieland wrote: > >On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > >> Con Wieland wrote: >> >>> My questions are, why am I getting the html attachments? >> >> >> Because the sender's MUA is sending them and your content filtering is >> either not on or is not removing HTML and not collapsing

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

On Apr 15, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Con Wieland wrote: > >> I am having trouble understanding what is going on with the >> attachments and archives. I have a message being sent to the list >> that appears to be text with a pdf attachment. With Mac mail I >> receive it as expected sh

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments

Con Wieland wrote: >I am having trouble understanding what is going on with the >attachments and archives. I have a message being sent to the list >that appears to be text with a pdf attachment. With Mac mail I >receive it as expected showing both the text and the attachment. When >I go to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Sciamano wrote: > >If this may help: to my MUA, the Excite user messages appear as >multipart/mixed, with multipart/alternative content and Plain Text >Documents. For this message, pass_mime_types with 'multipart', 'message/rfc822' and 'text/plain' only will deliver a message to the list which is

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

On 4/12/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Won't this make all > >messages from the Excite user be rejected? > > Not if there is any text/plain part in the message. If the Excite > user's message is multipart/alternative with text/plain and text/html > alternative parts and then a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Sciamano wrote: >On 4/12/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The above will remove everything which is not a text/plain part from >> the delivered messages. > >That's what I'm worried about, considering the fact that Excite >appends HTML automatically to outgoing messages. Won't this

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

On 4/12/08, Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This seems like a problem with the MUAs (mail clients) reading the > message rather than the message. That might be the issue, since I can read the messages correctly using KMail. > Set your content filtering as follows to do what you say you

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments and blank messages

Sciamano wrote: > >Basically, I don't want any attachments except for text files, nor any >HTML messages sent to the list. > >The list seems to work fine for most of the subscribers, except for >two of them, whose messages are creating problems: one who uses his >office email account and whose serv

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments that will not open.

Garrett L. Hudson wrote: >I am receiving "Uncaught bounce notifications" with an attachment that can >not be opened. I am assuming this is the original unrecognized bounce but I >can not verify. Any chance anyone has seen this before? Yes. The actual message which cannot be parsed as a bounce

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Liss sent the message below at 10:01 1/16/2008: >Okay, but when I send a message to THIS list (which is also mailman) using >html and Outlook, it doesn't create this issue & goes through the list >without the attachment. > >Why does it work with Mailman user list but not my own? > >Thanks for the l

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

> It happens when I send any html mail - I have tried every setting I > can think of to shut it off... Just delete any list info from non-digest options page., OMG, THANK You!!! It worked Great, thank you SO Very Much. ~Liss -- Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Hello 2008/1/16, Liss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Subject: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing > > The only info in the list attachment is the list info itself: > > -- > news Weekly Newsletter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.m

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Subject: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing The only info in the list attachment is the list info itself: -- news Weekly Newsletter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.mydomain.com/mailman/listinfo/mylist -

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

Liss wrote: > I've finally got my mailing list up and running, but no matter what I do, >every single msg comes with a .txt attachment. I cant figure out how to shut >it off! > >Any ideas? > End original message. - Here is your problem: "X-Mailer: Microsoft O

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every email showing

On 1/16/08, Liss wrote: > I've finally got my mailing list up and running, but no matter what I do, > every single msg comes with a .txt attachment. I cant figure out how to shut > it off! Search the FAQ Wizard for "footer". -- Brad Knowles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> LinkedIn Profile:

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in every message

On 12/30/07, Sarah wrote: > Hello. I run a mail man list and almost every message has an attachment on > it. Now there is no attachment when you look at the message but it appears > to be the footer of the message that is invisible to OE and I notice that > in thearchvies it says x attachments

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

--- Tokio Kikuchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Your site use Mailman-2.1.5 which is way too old. > Upgrade to the > current version (2.1.9) and try again. > > -- > Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://weather.is.kochi-u.ac.jp/ > ok that was it. Mailman 2.1.9 solves this problem. My

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

Hi, > Here is a URL where I created a list for testing > mailman. > > https://mail.bioacademy.gr/pipermail/testlist2/2007-May/thread.html Your site use Mailman-2.1.5 which is way too old. Upgrade to the current version (2.1.9) and try again. -- Tokio Kikuchi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://weather

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

Mailman developers: I've submitted a bug on the SF tracker (what, no Jira yet?) #1712034. What I write below is all I've got for now, and it's on the tracker; bug/patch traffic will followup to the tracker. Reply-To set to mailman-users. John Papapanos writes: > Here is a URL where I created a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - archives and encoding problems

> What do you mean by "scrambled"? Can you give a URL > where we can > observe this? What web browser do you use? How is > it configured for > viewing non-ASCII/ISO-8859-1 encodings? > Here is a URL where I created a list for testing mailman. https://mail.bioacademy.gr/pipermail/testlist2/200

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Typ x-zip-compressed being converted tobin

Michael Barnard wrote: > >We are using Mailman 2.1.5 on RaQ550 Kernel 2.4.19C12_V-1. > >When we mail the list with an attached zip file the extension is changed to >bin in the list archive. >The list members receive a zip file with the correct extension. In Mailman 2.1.5, if the attachment has a

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments created by Mailman?

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Everything now works fine, except -- when I send an HTML email, >Mailman seems to duplicate my images (which I have NOT included as >attachments--they're hosted on the Web) and send them along as >attachments. I'm afraid that my subscribers won't even want to ope

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Hello, > messages sent to non-digest subscribers. If this was the case in your > 2.1.4, you must have had a local patch to do it which was 'removed' > when you upgraded to 2.1.5. Hm, I don't remember exactly the version of mailman but it really worked 'out of box'. > if not GLOBAL_PIPELINE.coun

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >No. Previous version was 2.1.4. And new version (2.1.5) I installed via deb >(Debian package). In 2.1.4 attachments were scrubbed in simple non-digest >format (there was one bug with encoding). Just to be sure I understand, you are saying that attachments were scrubbed

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Hello, > In Mailman 2.1.6, there is an option to scrub attachments from > individual messages (non-digest emails). Prior to that, attachments > were only scrubbed from archives and plain text format digests. Are > you sure you didn't downgrade to 2.1.5? No. Previous version was 2.1.4. And new ver

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments are not scrubbed

Saulius wrote: > >yesterday I upgraded mailman to 2.1.5 version and noticed that >attachment no more were scrubbed (in non-digest emails) although in >previous version they were scrubbed. Is the a bug or where should I >'switch on' that attachments were srubbed automaticaly (i.e. attachment >wo

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

I am battling a somewhat related problem. I am trying to get mailman to save the attachment with the same file name as attachment. So, what is the syntax for SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION Is it True/False or 1/0 I am using mailman 2.1.6 Thanks Elvis On 9/16/05, Mark Sapiro <[EM

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

DW wrote: > >I searched Scrubber.py, and found some logic which said: > >"if mm_cfg.SCRUBBER_USE_ATTACHMENT_FILENAME_EXTENSION" I should have pointed you directly at this, but I'm glad you found it anyway. My excuse is it's new in 2.1.6 and I was looking at a 2.1.5 base. -- Mark Sapiro <[EMAIL PR

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

Mark Sapiro wrote: > DW wrote: > >>When users send email to any of my lists with attachments, they go >>through fine. But when someone tries to go back and get an attachment > >>from one of the archives, they almost always find that the link to the > >>attachment has a bad extension, and the

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments in archives have wrong extensions

DW wrote: > >When users send email to any of my lists with attachments, they go >through fine. But when someone tries to go back and get an attachment >from one of the archives, they almost always find that the link to the >attachment has a bad extension, and the web browser doesn't know what to

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Thanks so much for all of the help and information. I will try using MIME digests first. If things don't work for the subscribers, I can try Mark's code suggestion. ...eliz -- Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

At 8:03 PM -0600 2005-07-28, Elizabeth Lear wrote: > Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber > can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to > the code? I believe that omitting or hacking Scrubber.py is likely to lead to behaviour t

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Tokio Kikuchi wrote: > >Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >>>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in >>>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the >>>archiver. :-( >> >> >> Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber >> can be hac

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hi, Elizabeth Lear wrote: >>Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in >>ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the >>archiver. :-( > > > Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber > can be hacked out without breaking th

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

> Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in > ToDigest.py. I should have make it configurable like it was for the > archiver. :-( Ah, thanks. Before I give up completely, can you say whether scrubber can be hacked out without breaking things, or is it too integral to the co

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hi Mark, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >>Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through >>rather than trying to save them on the server? > > > You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, Sorry, but use of Mailman.Handlers.Scrubber is hard coded in ToDi

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through >rather than trying to save them on the server? You could remove Scrubber from the pipeline, but I don't think you want to do that because I think the MIME structure of the message with attachments will

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Hmm, thanks. Is there any way to configure it to just pass the attachments through rather than trying to save them on the server? ...eliz -- Children are made up of genetics, blind luck, and the stories you tell them. - The Flying Ks ---

Re: [Mailman-Users] attachments being stored for plain-text digests

Elizabeth Lear wrote: > >A list on my site is not using content filtering, and has set digests >to plain mode. I've double-checked that all digest subscribers are >also set to plain mode. This is irrelevant to the following. Digest plain or mime only governs whether the individual messages in t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments in digest mode

At 1:20 PM -0400 2005-07-20, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm quite new to mailman (having just implemented it) and > have run into the following problem: when e-mail containing > an attachment is sent to my test list, those users not in > digest mode receive it, but it is scrubbed for those u

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

Fred Macondray wrote: > >I attempted to approve and send a message to my announce-only list that had >a .jpg attachment. > >The message went out, but without the original attachment. > >The message that came through had the subscription options footer as a .txt >attachment. > >How can I 1) configu

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

Ram Dak wrote: >It is strange, but perhaps the first option under >'Content Filtering' should be set to 'Yes' rather than >'No'. If filter_content is set to "no", there should be no filtering of content and all MIME parts should be passed regardless of type. >I say strange because, as I mentione

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

It is strange, but perhaps the first option under 'Content Filtering' should be set to 'Yes' rather than 'No'. I say strange because, as I mentioned in my previous mail, the attachemnts did not go through earlier although I had deleted all the content types, and I had set the first option to 'yes'

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

Here is how I did it (and, for the perfectly sensible reason of allowing list members to share important documents with each other, since I use it as a discussion group) after much trial and error and frustration: Log in, click on 'Content Filtering' and set the options to the following values: 1

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

Bob Escher wrote: > >How do I allow attachments and html >to be allowed through? >Last week we had a list member send pdf >and they did get through. > >Or if someone does a nice document in Word >with graphics how can it be allowed to go through >with everything intact > I suggest you look at ht

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments

iginal Message- >From: Richard Barrett [EMAIL PROTECTED]','','','')">[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 8:02 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue > >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue (SOLVED)

Richard and John, thanks for your submissions, I also found a way to do it directly to the Scrubber.py file: change the line: filebase, ignore = os.path.splitext(filename) to: filebase, ext = os.path.splitext(filename) seems to have done the trick. Bascially just uses the extension of the fi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

Chris, Again, changing Scrubber.py will affect all the lists on that server. Warning aside, I took a look at Scrubber.py. Look at the function save_attachment(). The line 'ext = guess_extension(ctype, fnext)' tries to guess the proper file extension based on the extension of the file name in t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

Chris On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 03:25 pm, McKeever Chris wrote: On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:03 , Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 12:58 am, McKeever Chris wrote: I am trying to figure out how to resolve PDF's being converted into .obj extension

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

On Wed, 5 Nov 2003 08:03 , Richard Barrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > >On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 12:58 am, McKeever Chris wrote: > >> I am trying to figure out how to resolve PDF's being converted into >> .obj extensions in the archive (they get sent to list subscribers >> still i

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 12:58 am, McKeever Chris wrote: I am trying to figure out how to resolve PDF's being converted into .obj extensions in the archive (they get sent to list subscribers still in .pdf form). I have tried sending from multiple clients (yahoo, our webmail, and

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 23:10 , Pablo Chamorro C. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >I don't know how to do with pipermail. I use MHonARC as external >archiver. > >Pablo > >On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, McKeever Chris wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:58 , McKeever Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >> >> >I am trying to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

I don't know how to do with pipermail. I use MHonARC as external archiver. Pablo On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, McKeever Chris wrote: > On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:58 , McKeever Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: > > >I am trying to figure out how to resolve PDF's being converted into > .obj extensions in the ar

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments - PDF Issue

On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 18:58 , McKeever Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent: >I am trying to figure out how to resolve PDF's being converted into .obj extensions >in the archive (they get sent to list subscribers still in .pdf >form). > >I have tried sending from multiple clients (yahoo, our webmail, and

RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not at end + archive

At 5:11 PM +0200 2003/07/31, CARTER Anthony wrote: Yes, using MIME digests...However, will the attachments still be available. Some come as non-text, and I need to have the attachments available. I'm not sure how attachments would be handled in non-MIME format. I would be interested to know wh

RE: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not at end + archive

EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not at end + archive At 4:38 PM +0200 2003/07/31, CARTER Anthony wrote: > Archives are working and attachments are being stripped and all. Perfect. > However, when there is a thread, the text is all first, and the attachments > f

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments not at end + archive

At 4:38 PM +0200 2003/07/31, CARTER Anthony wrote: Archives are working and attachments are being stripped and all. Perfect. However, when there is a thread, the text is all first, and the attachments for all messages are placed at the bottom of the entire thread. Is there a way to embed the a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

Gee, maybe you should start writing code, eh? I used to until [troll deleted by moderator] As one of the admins here, I've just set [EMAIL PROTECTED] to moderated status, so all of his postings will be approved by one of the moderators before going to the list. Given where this discussion is r

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

At 7:31 PM -0500 2003/07/30, schuetzen wrote: so, there IS a solution. just requires someone who wants to provide a product for about a hundred thousand listowners who are going to come boiling out of YHG when yhg starts charging for their services. Go to the Yahoo! people, pay them a billi

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

chasm wrote: ... I am still looking for a single switch to turn off all attachments. If Yahoo, using this same software although blended with EZMLM and a mess of scripts, can do this one thing, then it should be able to be done by the programmers of this software. Mailman has been designed t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 18:37:27 -0500, you wrote: > > Gee, maybe you should start writing code, eh? I used to until I came down with cancer and started taking morphine for the pain. you probably know that morphine destroys logical thought progression. so now I just vaguely remember when I used t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:35:05 +0200, you wrote: > > But there isn't any "Big Red Switch", nor is there ever likely to be one. and yet there is one on Yahoogroups, which uses Mailman and EZMLM and a mess of other scripts. so, there IS a solution. just requires someone who wants to provide a

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 01:27:51 +0200, you wrote: >HTML, the value for this header might be >"multipart/alternative". > > We need specifics. > >> it is quite obvious that you are baiting me but that you clearly understand what I am wanting and asking for. Why don't you readdress

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

At 1:27 AM +0200 2003/07/31, Brad Knowles wrote: For example, if a message is PGP signed, the "Content-Type:" header might be "multipart/signed", "multipart/mixed", or there might be no MIME headers or formatting at all, and the message is in plain ASCII with internal formatting that PG

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

On Wed, Jul 30, 2003 at 04:59:44PM -0500, schuetzen wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 17:50:03 -0400 (EDT), you wrote: > > > > >"Remove message attachments that don't have a matching content type. Leave > >this field blank to skip this filter test.": > > > >multipart/mixed > >multipart/alternative > >t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Attachments Possible?

At 5:31 PM -0500 2003/07/30, schuetzen wrote: what i want to delete is stuff which is ATTACHED to the body of the message, a scond part of the message. it could be multipart or a part of the body. Attached in what way? If it's MIME, you can't embed an image in the body of a message bodypart.

  1   2   >