> -Original Message-
> From: Harold Paulson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> more than being disk or CPU bound, isn't this mostly,
> have-to-send-an-email-to-each-address bound?
No...
I did the same thing last thursday without email notification.
Unsubscribed 4000+ adresses which took abou
Hi,
more than being disk or CPU bound, isn't this mostly,
have-to-send-an-email-to-each-address bound?
- H
At 4:43 PM -0600 7/13/01, Charlie Watts wrote:
>I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of about
>12,000.
>
>This is on FreeBSD 4.3, a dual-proc PIII 500. Othe
On 7/14/01 11:32 AM, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> According to brief examination here its lock bound rather than IO or
> CPU.
So mailman is setting and removing the lock for every address? If so --
Barry, isn't that a design flaw for this case?
--
Chuq Von Rospach, Internet Gnom
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:56:13 -0700
> Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 7/13/01 3:43 PM, "Charlie Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of
> >> about 12,000.
>
> >> It is taki
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:56:13 -0700
Chuq Von Rospach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/13/01 3:43 PM, "Charlie Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of
>> about 12,000.
>> It is taking -forever- . Watching ~logs/subscribe, addresses are
On 7/13/01 3:43 PM, "Charlie Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying to unsubscribe about 1000 addresses from a list of about
> 12,000.
> It is taking -forever- . Watching ~logs/subscribe, addresses are being
> un-subscribed at about 1 message per second.
>
> Is this normal?
Wouldn't s
