At 10:52 PM -0400 2003/07/09, Jon Carnes wrote:
sendmail option seemed to really help. I'm down to 4 to 10 minutes
with most messages at 6.
It really helps when you move those slow MTA's to the end of the line,
they don't block the messages getting out to the quicker ones.
That is another rec
At 4:05 PM -0700 2003/07/09, Eric Miller wrote:
One question: Should I be looking at a better MTA?
For mailing lists, postfix tends to be better suited to the job
out-of-the-box. If you know what you're doing, it is possible to
configure sendmail to do the job better than even postfix can do
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 19:05, Eric Miller wrote:
> Thank you all for the suggestions and references.
> I made some quick changes, especially the
>
> O Timeout.iconnect=5s
>
> sendmail option seemed to really help. I'm down to 4 to 10 minutes
> with most messages at 6.
>
It really helps when you
age-
From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 2:19 PM
To: Eric Miller
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Return to performance
At 8:36 AM -0700 2003/07/09, Eric Miller wrote:
> Something else that puzzles me is that some of the recipie
At 8:36 AM -0700 2003/07/09, Eric Miller wrote:
Something else that puzzles me is that some of the recipients seem to have
very slow mail receivers, especially in India and China. Is there a way
to find slow connections and group them together so they don't slow down
everyone else?
For MTA p
On Wed, 2003-07-09 at 11:36, Eric Miller wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> In my last post on performance you gave me a lot of good advice.
> Some things that helped:
> Set SMTP_MAX_RCTPS back to default of 500 (I found a posting
>that said 3 to 5 was better, must have been an old version)
> Upped my
