"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote:
>
> Setting up an announce-only list /ought/ to be much easier in MM2.1.
>
> - You can disable the List-Post: header separately, since it isn't
> meaningful for announce-only lists.
>
> - You can set a moderate flag on all your members (and for any new
> members tha
> "BP" == Bill Poff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BP> I've looked and looked and cannot find "Addresses of members
BP> accepted for posting to this list without implicit approval
BP> requirement".
BP> I'm using version 2.1b1 are you looking at a different
BP> version?
Yup
Setting up an announce-only list /ought/ to be much easier in MM2.1.
- You can disable the List-Post: header separately, since it isn't
meaningful for announce-only lists.
- You can set a moderate flag on all your members (and for any new
members that later join).
- You can set an automati
Thanks. That's exactly what I did but the welcome message sent out still
tells subscribers how to post, etc... which is what bothers me. I know from
combing through the archives that there is no way to fix this without access
to the config files but is there an alternate solution or does anyone kn
it a little easier for
these folks.
--Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of J C Lawrence
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 2:33 AM
> To: Benjamin Young
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Read-Onl
There is another way to do (for those that can't patch
mailman)
It is to ignore the mailman user interface and to use the commands
by mail in your own interface: here an example in php
mail($to, "subscribe xxx nodigest address=".$email, "",
$from);
mail($to, "unsubscribe xxx ".$email, "", $f
On Mon, 20 May 2002 19:37:48 -0700
Benjamin Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am new to Mailman and have searched the archives without finding a
> solution to my problem but could not find an answer. I would like to
> create a list where only the admin has permission to post (e.g. an
> announ
On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, at 07:21 PM, Bob Weissman wrote:
> What an idiot.
Well, the rest of us figured that out last week. Where were you? :)
--
You are responsible for your rose.
"Rule 5: Get Kirsten Dunst wet" (p 74 of Time 20-05-02)
--
At 06:21 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>At 06:01 PM 5/21/02, you wrote:
>>At 05:45 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>>That's it. If you would spend half the amount of time learning Python and
>>>HTML as you do complaining, you would have figured all of this out by now.
>>
>>I know HTML just
At 06:01 PM 5/21/02, you wrote:
>At 05:45 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>>That's it. If you would spend half the amount of time learning Python and
>>HTML as you do complaining, you would have figured all of this out by now.
>
>I know HTML just fine thank you but I am not a Python programmer. Ev
At 05:45 PM 5/21/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>This is eminently doable, but you have to be willing and able to patch
Mailman.
>
>1. Patch Mailman to be able to turn off the List-* headers on a per-list
>basis so you don't confuse your subscribers with instructions that don't
>work. I can send thi
This is eminently doable, but you have to be willing and able to patch Mailman.
1. Patch Mailman to be able to turn off the List-* headers on a per-list basis so you
don't confuse your subscribers with instructions that don't work. I can send this
patch to anyone who wants it. I haven't figured
LOTS OF LUCK! I asked how to do this and only got rude answers that said
I am trying to force the software to do things it was not intended to
do. If you figure it out let me know. BTW the actual restricting of posts
to just you is the easy part. The numerous referneces to web pages,
post
13 matches
Mail list logo
