Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

Thank you for the confirmation Mark. -Original Message- From: Mark Sapiro [mailto:m...@msapiro.net] Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 2:41 PM To: Montanez, Victor; mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action This is an EXTERNAL

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

On 07/15/2016 11:08 AM, Montanez, Victor wrote: > Hello Mark, > > For the possible alternative you mention below: > > If we do set up the unsubscribe policy to "yes" and in the "unsubscribe > MODERATORPASSWD address=user@example" command we include the moderator/owner > password would that acco

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

56 AM To: mailman-users@python.org Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action This is an EXTERNAL EMAIL. Stop and think before clicking links or opening attachments. * On 07/15/2016 09:34 AM, Montanez, Victor wrote: >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 unsubscribe without confirmation action

On 07/15/2016 09:34 AM, Montanez, Victor wrote: > Can the list owners send a command via email to unsubscribe users of > a list that will NOT cause a confirmation email to be generated to > the subscribers? Only if the admin knows the user's list password. If so, the admin can send the command u

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:38:01 -0700, you wrote: >On 9/12/2003 9:57, "Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, it is. At this point I've only got one subscriber to a test list >> - me. I have no good way to tell if it will send to a different >> domain... > >Get yourself a free em

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On 9/12/2003 9:57, "Michael W. Cocke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it is. At this point I've only got one subscriber to a test list > - me. I have no good way to tell if it will send to a different > domain... Get yourself a free email account (on Yahoo or wherever) and subscribe it to

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Behalf Of Michael W. Cocke >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 2:53 PM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail > > > >I just noticed that when I have mailman running (for what THAT'S >worth), the syst

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

I just noticed that when I have mailman running (for what THAT'S worth), the system bogs down hopelessly. I MUST have this thing set up wrong, but darned if I see what I did! I've tried following the INSTALL file that comes with mailman, but I guess I'm too stupid - is there a blooming idiots g

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

IL PROTECTED] >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf >Of Michael W. Cocke >Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 9:44 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail > >On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:04:50 -0500, you wrote: > >>If you are using

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:04:50 -0500, you wrote: >If you are using the RPM that came with RH9, that's your problem...it's >broken. Remove the RPM and install from source. > >Mike I Already did that twice, but thanks for the suggestion. Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will s

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman 2.1.2 not sending mail

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:20:04 -0400, you wrote: >Does "mailmanctl stop" kill all the mailman processes or does the >Outgoing queue stay up? Looks like it kills everything. >Which version of python are you running? Python 2.2.2 Mike- Mornings: Evolution in action. Only the grumpy will survive.

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 and htdig again.

Richard Barrett wrote: > Sorry not to respond before but I just got back from a week away and found your post to mailman-users list. Hey it's all good :) I only just posted it anyway :)--I hope your week away was good. It's nice to be able to take some time off and relax now again! > As you look

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

This, along with per-domain create passwords are by far at the top of my feature wish-list. Aliasing is a royal PITA because it is a completely manual process which gets completely out of hand when you are hosting many domains/lists on one machine. On Thursday 31 July 2003 11:42 am, Glenn Sieb

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 13:42, Glenn Sieb wrote: > Jim Breton said: > > I have set up the above on a FreeBSD 4.7 system with the intention of > > being able to host per-virtual-domain mailing lists. > > Yay! Another FBSD user! :) > > > I want to be able to have: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > and >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2, Postfix 2.0.13, virtual domains

Jim Breton said: > I have set up the above on a FreeBSD 4.7 system with the intention of > being able to host per-virtual-domain mailing lists. Yay! Another FBSD user! :) > I want to be able to have: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > and > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > as completely separate, autonomous lists. Ca

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.6 withpostfix

At 10:42 PM +0200 2003/07/30, Gerben Wierda wrote: But what is not working is mail. No message is being sent, nothing appears in postfix's logs nor in mailman's logs. Without clues I have no idea on how to debug this. Is there anyone who can help me out? Have you send the FAQ entry at

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 on Mac OS X 10.2.6 with postfix

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gerben Wierda wrote: > But what is not working is mail. No message is being sent, nothing > appears in postfix's logs nor in mailman's logs. Without clues I have > no idea on how to debug this. So you send mail to a list and there is nothing in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 + Apache 2.0.47

> "DB" == Dhruba Bandopadhyay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DB> Has anyone got latest release of mailman working with apache2? If so, DB> how? And if not, what problems did you have? When will mailman support DB> for apache2 be official? Works just fine. Mailman is just a CGI program as far

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2

s for the help. Joe -Original Message- From: Richard Barrett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 8:50 AM To: jsmith Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2 At 16:00 26/06/2003, jsmith wrote: >Hello all, > >I have had the unfortunate problem of the p

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman 2.1.2

At 16:00 26/06/2003, jsmith wrote: Hello all, I have had the unfortunate problem of the place that hosts my collocated server move data centers from one coast to the other. And it seems to have broke a few things. I am running FreeBSD 4.7 with Sendmail. I made sure qrunner was started and sendma

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.2 (htdig???)

On 24/06/2003 ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: > Did Richard finally include his htdig (etc..) patches in 2.1.2? > I haven't seen them at the SF download site. i propose to use another external archiver like lurker. lurker has a very mighty search function and provides many more options. see http://lurk

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman-2.1.2 (htdig???)

At 11:31 24/06/2003, ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: Did Richard finally include his htdig (etc..) patches in 2.1.2? I haven't seen them at the SF download site. They have not been folded into the main MM source and the patches are still available on sourceforge. In total I would advise you to apply