Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman/sendmail process /var/spool/mail content

Mark Sapiro writes: > I agree, it's not clear, Oh, I don't mean your interpretation is implausible. I just wanted to make sure my alternative was on the table because he mentioned "hundreds". If they really were all of one post, automatically sending them all could easily result in a loop back

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman/sendmail process /var/spool/mail content

On 02/05/2016 07:57 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote: > Mark Sapiro writes: > > > > So during some period, the MTA was delivering list mail to mboxes in > > /var/spool/mail instead of to Mailman. Is that correct? > > It sounds to me like this is Sendmail's out queue. I don't use > Sendmail so do

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman/sendmail process /var/spool/mail content

Mark Sapiro writes: > On 02/05/2016 07:15 AM, s...@ebi.ac.uk wrote: > > > > We had an issue with the mailman server which is now back and running, > > mqueue is empty however /var/spool/mail contains many hundreds of files > > containing an email that was not posted during the period we had a

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman/sendmail process /var/spool/mail content

On 02/05/2016 07:15 AM, s...@ebi.ac.uk wrote: > > We had an issue with the mailman server which is now back and running, > mqueue is empty however /var/spool/mail contains many hundreds of files > containing an email that was not posted during the period we had an > issue. Is there way to process

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail not accepting email's

Llewellyn Curran wrote: >I have to stay with sendmail due to my friends >configuration at the moment. So I attempt to send my first mail, no joy, and >I go to analyze my /var/log/maillog theres nothing there, so I login to >telnet, and im able to send mail. So I throw TCPDump up using : tcpdump >s

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail

Mark Sapiro wrote: >Rich West wrote: > > > >>I did some further analysis and discovered that the messages (with the >>same message ID) were showing up in the "ps" output as processing "from >>queue". Digging a little further, I tried killing off the sendmail >>processes that were processin

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail

Rich West wrote: >I did some further analysis and discovered that the messages (with the >same message ID) were showing up in the "ps" output as processing "from >queue". Digging a little further, I tried killing off the sendmail >processes that were processing those requests, and I saw the fo

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail

I did some further analysis and discovered that the messages (with the same message ID) were showing up in the "ps" output as processing "from queue". Digging a little further, I tried killing off the sendmail processes that were processing those requests, and I saw the following appear in the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail addressing

rob.exley wrote: > >On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:46, Mark Sapiro wrote: >> Rob.Exley wrote: >> > >> >Even though I have modified /var/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py to change >> >DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST to be 'lists.ntg.equifax.com'. I have also modified the >> >'Host name this list prefres for email' in the web

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail addressing

On Tue, 2004-10-05 at 16:46, Mark Sapiro wrote: > Rob.Exley wrote: > > > >Even though I have modified /var/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py to change > >DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST to be 'lists.ntg.equifax.com'. I have also modified the > >'Host name this list prefres for email' in the web interface for my test >

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail addressing

Rob.Exley wrote: > >Even though I have modified /var/mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py to change >DEFAULT_EMAIL_HOST to be 'lists.ntg.equifax.com'. I have also modified the >'Host name this list prefres for email' in the web interface for my test >mailing list to be 'lists.ntg.equifax.com'. This doesn't se

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + sendmail configuration help needed

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kamal Ahmed wrote: > I am trying to setup mailman with sendmail , and it does not seem to > work, i.e , it does not even send out e-mail after I create a list, > and i should be able to subscribe to a list as well using reply to > the mailman e-mail. >

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail issues

I don't want to presume the extent of your expertise, but did you run the 'newaliases' command after adding the entries? Cheers Hilton -Original Message- From: Mark Sass Brad, Thanks for the quick response, and I wish that were true. Here are the entries copied from my /etc/mail

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail issues

> "Mark" == Mark Sass <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Mark> mailman: "|/var/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman" and the error message indicates that sendmail picked up the config properly, too. So the only thing I can think of is that /var/mailman/mail/mailman doesn't exist (seem

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail issues

be mailman" mailman-unsubscribe: "|/var/mailman/mail/mailman unsubscribe mailman" I appreciate the help, but I have been through this. Mark -Original Message- From: Brad Knowles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 7:18 PM To: Mark Sass Cc: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail issues

At 5:21 PM -0500 2004/05/18, Mark Sass wrote: My biggest problem is that whenever I send email to one of the aliases created I get this error: May 18 11:52:32 hostname procmail[32308]: Unknown user "|/var/mailman/mail/mailman post mailman" May 18 11:52:32 hostname sendmail[32307]: i4IGqWp32306

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman sendmail error

Hi! On Sam, Sep 06, 2003 at 12:45:52 -0700, Merle Reine wrote: > I get the following in /var/log/mail when trying to send to > [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Sep 6 00:23:30 mail postfix/qmgr[5425]: 670D71159B: > from=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, size=584, nrcpt=1 (queue active) > Sep 6 00:23:30 mail Mailman

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horriblyslowperformance..suggestions please?!?

for closure of this topic: Begin forwarded message: From: "Andrew Falgout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon Aug 25, 2003 8:22:05 pm Europe/London To: "Richard Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horriblyslowperformance..suggestions please?!?

h the MTA. - Original Message - From: "Richard Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andrew Falgout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperform

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance..suggestions please?!?

indicative of this show up in the $prefix/locks directory. - Original Message - From: "Richard Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andrew Falgout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horriblyslowperformance..suggestions please?!?

ot;Andrew Falgout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Richard Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 9:09 AM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance..suggestions please?!? > The description of the

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance..suggestions please?!?

es me, because the mail system on this server delivers mail > directly to a mailbox in seconds. Why the delay? > > - Original Message - > From: "Richard Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Andrew Falgout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance..suggestions please?!?

]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2003 3:36 PM Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slow performance..suggestions please?!? > > On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 12:51 am, Andrew Falgout wrote: > > > I'm currently running mailman-2

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slow performance..suggestions please?!?

On Sunday, August 24, 2003, at 12:51 am, Andrew Falgout wrote: I'm currently running mailman-2.0.13-1 eith sendmail-8.11.6-25.72. Posts are processed very fast, but delivery is more than slow. It takes 1-2 minutes per post to delivery mail. Evaluating what is going on in the queue is a littl

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slow performance..suggestions please?!?

On Monday, August 25, 2003, at 04:59 am, Andrew Falgout wrote: Sendmail usually delivers regular mail on an almost instant basis. What I'm getting it a feel that qrunner is not passing the mails from the qfiles directory for sendmail to deliver. If the qrunner is executing then it is trying to

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slow performance..suggestions please?!?

Sendmail usually delivers regular mail on an almost instant basis. What I'm getting it a feel that qrunner is not passing the mails from the qfiles directory for sendmail to deliver. The machine in question has around 15k uses on it, and they have almost instant mail delivery through sendmail

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slow performance..suggestions please?!?

At 4:39 PM -0500 2003/08/24, Mike Kercher wrote: This could be caused by a DNS bottleneck. I would recommend you setup a caching-only nameserver on your Mailman box and see if that helps. This is covered in Mailman FAQ Entry "6.8. Improving performance by DNS caching"

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance..suggestions please?!?

This could be caused by a DNS bottleneck. I would recommend you setup a caching-only nameserver on your Mailman box and see if that helps. Remember to modify /etc/resolv.conf to add a line at the top: nameserver 127.0.0.1 Mike -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman / Sendmail horribly slowperformance.. suggestions please?!?

At 6:51 PM -0500 2003/08/23, Andrew Falgout wrote: I'm currently running mailman-2.0.13-1 eith sendmail-8.11.6-25.72. Posts are processed very fast, but delivery is more than slow. You may want to consider sendmail 8.12 (current is 8.12.9, with 8.12.10 currently in Beta2). There are many new

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail

Jason K. Brandt wrote: > Hi, > > I am having problems getting mailman setup on a server using sendmail > as the mail server. This is a Redhat 9 machine, and is pretty much a > default install, besides the fix for the bug from the default redhat > install. So mailman comes up and runs, I can setu

Re: [Mailman-Users] mailman - sendmail sending queue too long

This is the one big problem with running a non-optimized MTA and is the reason I (and so many others) moved over to Postfix. Try setting SMTP_MAX_RCPTS = 5 in the ~mailman/Mailman/mm_cfg.py file === # Ceiling on the number of recipients that # can be specified in a single SMTP # transact

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman + Sendmail + Py v1.5.2 == OK?

On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 11:51:19PM -0800, Roger Chrisman wrote: > Could someone tell me, will Mailman work OK (reliably) with Sendmail > and Python v1.5.2? > > My virtual Web host only has Sendmail, and Python v1.5.2. I do not > get root access so getting Postfix, Exim, or Qmail probably means

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail issue

PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 31, 2001 11:16 AM To: David Krebsbach Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail issue Well David by default Red Hat 7.2 does not port mail through the LAN. I had to do two thing first of all in /etc/mail/sendmail.mc I had to dnl

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman/Sendmail issue

Well David by default Red Hat 7.2 does not port mail through the LAN. I had to do two thing first of all in /etc/mail/sendmail.mc I had to dnl this line DAEMON_OPTIONS (`Port_SMTP, ADDR=127.0.0.1, Name=MTA`) and rebuild the sendmail.cf and Then in the /etc/mail/access I had to add 127.0.0.1 RELAY

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman & Sendmail problems

> -Original Message- > From: 'Alexander Prohorenko' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2001 18:55 > On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:45:00PM +0200, Enriko Groen wrote: > > > Mailman just do nothing with a messages. Can you please > > > advise me what > > > should I look

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman & Sendmail problems

On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 05:45:00PM +0200, Enriko Groen wrote: > > Mailman just do nothing with a messages. Can you please > > advise me what > > should I look > > at to fix this? Thanks. > Have you checked if the mails are maybe on hold? > You can check this through the webinterface... Can you

RE: [Mailman-Users] Mailman & Sendmail problems

> -Original Message- > From: Alexander Prohorenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > I've got a problem working Mailman. I've installed it > properly, everything > works, > but nobody can post/subscribe to the list. Ie, I'm > subscribing my email > through the > web, I'm recieveing a conf

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman & Sendmail problems

Did you edit your /etc/aliases file after you created the list? -- -Keith [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Alexander Prohorenko wrote: > Hello guys, > > I've got a problem working Mailman. I've installed it properly, everything > works, > but nobody can post/subscribe to the list. Ie,

Re: [Mailman-Users] Mailman & Sendmail problems

Hi, Actually I just got the same problem. Everything installed properly, I can see mail delivered to the wrapper, but subscriptions stay "pending" in logs/subscribe and mail sent to the list just disappear somewhere. Thanks for help, Thierry PS RedHat 6.2, Sendmail 8.9.3, Mailman 2.0.5 Alexand