RE: [Fwd: RE: [Mailman-Users] Local DNS vs. DNS on the same subnet]

2003-01-23 Thread Angel E. Gabriel
EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Mailman-Users] Local DNS vs. DNS on the same subnet > Date: 20 Jan 2003 22:49:58 + > > Damn, this posses a problem! I'm going to have to make do with having a DNS > server on the same subnet, and when I get the chance, I

[Fwd: RE: [Mailman-Users] Local DNS vs. DNS on the same subnet]

2003-01-20 Thread Neil Dombrowski
econdary network cards, and a seperate hub. That way, it should be as fast > as it can go. > > -Original Message- > From: Chuq Von Rospach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:16 PM > To: Angel Gabriel > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re

RE: [Mailman-Users] Local DNS vs. DNS on the same subnet

2003-01-20 Thread Angel Gabriel
on Rospach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 10:16 PM To: Angel Gabriel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mailman-Users] Local DNS vs. DNS on the same subnet On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 02:22 PM, Angel Gabriel wrote: > My question is, would it be quicker to have t

Re: [Mailman-Users] Local DNS vs. DNS on the same subnet

2003-01-20 Thread Chuq Von Rospach
On Monday, January 20, 2003, at 02:22 PM, Angel Gabriel wrote: My question is, would it be quicker to have the DNS on the same machine as mailman, Yes, sometimes very significantly. -- Chuq Von Rospach, Architech [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.plaidworks.com/chuqui/blog/ Yes, I am an agen