Re: [Mailman-Users] List of All Subscribers

2003-10-01 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kruger, David wrote: > I have tried the 'who' command with password in the body of the message > it is not working for me. This is what is returned: > The results of your email command are provided below. Attached is your > original message. > - Res

RE: [Mailman-Users] List of All Subscribers

2003-10-01 Thread Kruger, David
r) members: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Unprocessed: =20 - Done. Any ideas of what I am doing wrong? -Original Message- From: John DeCarlo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 1:33 PM To: Rob Day Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [Mailma

Re: [Mailman-Users] List of All Subscribers

2003-10-01 Thread John DeCarlo
Rob, Others have given you very clear answers. Let me just say that "who" out of the box only returns the email addresses. Useful for a machine, but not as useful for humans. If you search the archives, you will find a post from me, with corrections from others, on how to modify "who" to retu

Re: [Mailman-Users] List of All Subscribers

2003-09-30 Thread Jon Carnes
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 16:59, Rob Day wrote: > My organization recently switched from Majordomo to Mailman. We are *very* > happy with the change to say the least. > One of my list owners needs to get a list of all subscribers for a > particular list and she needs to do this frequently. She does not

Re: [Mailman-Users] List of All Subscribers

2003-09-30 Thread Todd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rob Day wrote: > I was about to set up a cron job to email her the list of subscribers > weekly, but I thought I'd check with this list first. Is there a Mailman > equivalent for the Majordomo command "who"? Thanks. There is, but it's confusingly name