Re: [Mailman-Users] withlist -q still not quiet

2008-10-11 Thread Mark Sapiro
Kelly Jones wrote: >Mark, according to "withlist --help": > >% bin/withlist [options] listname [args ...] > >which means the listname is required on the command line, no? True, but the latter explaination of the "--all / -a" option qualifies this >How do I move the listname into a script inste

Re: [Mailman-Users] withlist -q still not quiet

2008-10-11 Thread Kelly Jones
Mark, according to "withlist --help": % bin/withlist [options] listname [args ...] which means the listname is required on the command line, no? How do I move the listname into a script instead? -- We're just a Bunch Of Regular Guys, a collective group that's trying to understand and assimilat

Re: [Mailman-Users] withlist -q still not quiet

2008-10-07 Thread Mark Sapiro
Kelly Jones wrote: >Why does "withlist -q test" say "The variable `m' is the test MailList >instance". Shouldn't -q suppress that message? Arguably it should, but no one anticipated you would want to supress the banner in interactive mode. >It's annoying because I run withlist stuff in cron an

[Mailman-Users] withlist -q still not quiet

2008-10-07 Thread Kelly Jones
Why does "withlist -q test" say "The variable `m' is the test MailList instance". Shouldn't -q suppress that message? It's annoying because I run withlist stuff in cron and want it to run silently unless there are errors. I realize I can: 2| fgrep -v 'the variable `m' is the' or something, but t