Re: [Mailman-Users] user feedback on plain digests

2003-01-18 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Bryan Fullerton wrote: On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 07:36 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: One of my goals for the digester was that either digest could be burst and the individual messages would look exactly as if they had arrived independently. Or

Re: [Mailman-Users] user feedback on plain digests

2003-01-18 Thread Bryan Fullerton
On Thursday, January 16, 2003, at 07:36 PM, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: One of my goals for the digester was that either digest could be burst and the individual messages would look exactly as if they had arrived independently. Or at least, they'd be useable to do follow ups back to the list. Maybe

Re: [Mailman-Users] user feedback on plain digests

2003-01-18 Thread Tokio Kikuchi
Hi, Barry. Barry A. Warsaw wrote: "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BF> When I get a chance later today I'll be trying the patch Tokio BF> Kikuchi sent to mailman-developers - hopefully it will resolve BF> the excess headers issue. I'm off the net at the moment

Re: [Mailman-Users] user feedback on plain digests

2003-01-18 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BF" == Bryan Fullerton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BF> When I get a chance later today I'll be trying the patch Tokio BF> Kikuchi sent to mailman-developers - hopefully it will resolve BF> the excess headers issue. I'm off the net at the moment so I can't look at the patch, bu

[Mailman-Users] user feedback on plain digests

2003-01-16 Thread Bryan Fullerton
Several of my list owners are quite unhappy with the state of plain text digests in 2.1. Here's one comment sent to me this morning: = I must admit that until this post appeared I had not noticed that the messages were still numbered. Since the index is numbered, the number is really usefull