At 8:46 AM -0700 6/23/05, Carl Zwanzig wrote:
>No, it really doesn't. Without getting in the minds of the developers:
>* virtually every OS is packaged with facilities for reading/writing text files
>* text files are dead easy to fix
>* text files are fast for most operations, esp sequential reads
In a flurry of recycled electrons, Jean-Philippe GIOLA wrote:
> Bill Landry wrote:
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> nobody has answered me so I ask my question an another time...!
I'd have thought that the answer fairly was obvious...
> >> I want to know why the mailman's developpers have choosen t
Bill Landry wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Jean-Philippe GIOLA"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Hi all!
>> nobody has answered me so I ask my question an another time...!
>> I want to know why the mailman's developpers have choosen to store mail
>> for the archives in txt files and not i
- Original Message -
From: "Jean-Philippe GIOLA" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi all!
> nobody has answered me so I ask my question an another time...!
> I want to know why the mailman's developpers have choosen to store mail
> for the archives in txt files and not in a database like forums
See
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 10:38:52AM +0200, Jean-Philippe GIOLA wrote:
> nobody has answered me so I ask my question an another time...!
> I want to know why the mailman's developpers have choosen to store mail
> for the archives in txt files and not in a database like forums
> thanks for your answe
Hi all!
nobody has answered me so I ask my question an another time...!
I want to know why the mailman's developpers have choosen to store mail
for the archives in txt files and not in a database like forums
thanks for your answers!
reguards
--
Jean-Philippe Giola - 6577
