2:41:25 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-->--
Unfortunately the mbox files for the archives at python.org are
borked, but checking other posts of mine there universally show
correct in-Reply-To: and References: headers. eg:
-->--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 1
On Fri, 02 Nov 2001 10:42:33 +0100
Lucas Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By the way, your messages do not thread in the mailman user
> maillist archive. Which MUA are you using?
exmh. Quoting the headers from this very message:
In-Reply-To: Message from Lucas Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Thursday 01 November 2001 10:00, J C Lawrence wrote:
> > Based on a little experiment it seem that mail (unix mail
> > command), kmail, and outlook express do not.
>
> I can't comment on Outlook. The other's you listed do generate
> correct In-Reply-To: headers.
>
Are you sure? Look at the fo
On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 11:30:22 +0100
Lucas Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2001 10:10, J C Lawrence wrote:
>> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:23:37 +0100
>> Then the MUAs your users are using are not generating correct
>> headers.
> Which MTA do correctly generate those headers
On Wednesday 31 October 2001 10:10, J C Lawrence wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:23:37 +0100
>
> Lucas Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > How does pipermail generated the threaded view.
>
> In accordance with In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
>
> > In our installation the threaded view of t
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 14:23:37 +0100
Lucas Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How does pipermail generated the threaded view.
In accordance with In-Reply-To: and References: headers.
> In our installation the threaded view of the testlist is identical
> to to date view.
Then the MUAs your use
How does pipermail generated the threaded view. In our installation the
threaded view of the testlist is identical to to date view.
Something wrong here, but what?
--
Regards,
Lucas Hofman
PGS Researchwork: +47 67514059
PO Box 354
